196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
view the rest of the comments
Would a christian stop being a christian if God or Jesus appeared before them and performed a miracle? What if they don't actually demand anything or say anything about whether they approve of the christian religion?
Stop being a Christian? No.
Were the apostles Christian? Yes, but their faith wasn't built on belief without proof, it was based on sure and certain knowledge. Likewise, if a 'god' (or suitably godlike entity) turns up, one can be a follower, and follow their tenets as closely as any, but one would not need to be a believer, because any uncertainty has been removed.
But earlier in this thread, you wrote that knowing, as opposed to believing, makes it easier to be an atheist.
And IIRC Arceus never actually wanted to start a religion, so worshipping them would still be firmly in the realm of belief.
Yes, I think we may have slightly different views on exactly an atheist is. I'm saying that knowing a god existed would make it easier to be an atheist as you would not need to believe they exist, rather you would know, and have unarguable proof, that they exist. The way I see it, it is the believe/non belief aspect that is core to atheism. The worship is just an attempt not to be smited by a being unimaginably more powerful than one's self. Equally, if the entity wished not to be worshiped, one would be wise to heed that wish, for fear of retribution.
One could add caveats around godhood, such as requiring that they created the universe, or that they are omnipotent and omnicient, to try to diferentiate between gods and mearly massively powerful entities, but I feel that exact definitions are getting into theistic philosophy that isn't helpful here.
As far as I can tell, in the Pokemon universe Arceus is a real, interacts with the wotld and its inhabitants, and either created or shaped the universe. I think that would count as a god by most any definition. Before meeting one, an atheist might maintain that Arceus is just a figment of the imagination, and refuse to believe in it, but after meeting one, there would be no need to believe, making it a lot easier to be an atheist in that regard. Abiding by the Arceus' wishes would likely be a sound move however.
So the bible is full of atheists? IDK man, that doesn't really make sense to me.
There's plenty of them in it. The tribes of the old testament didn't have to believe, they knew that a vengeful entity would cause the ground to open up, swallowing them and their family, if they didn't follow the rules exactly. They knew because they'd seen it happen. The apostles didn't have to believe because they hung out with a guy who called himself the son of god and kept performing miracles to prove it.
Of course, the folk a couple of towns over, who didn't experience any of this, but heard the stories, would have to decide whether to believe that the step-son of a carpenter, and his real dad, were deities, one deity with multiple aspects, or just a clever ruse that took in the people who saw the performances. They might wonder why their sicknesses weren't being cured, and decide to believe in the hope of redemption, or not to believe the story of a kind and benificient god who ignored them.