this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
386 points (92.3% liked)

Europe

8399 readers
1486 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump has said the U.S. will revisit its stance on Greenland in the coming weeks.

Asked if he expected to take action on the territory, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday: "Let's talk about Venezuela, Russia, Ukraine. We'll worry about Greenland in about two months. Let's talk about Greenland in 20 days."

He added: "We need Greenland from a national security situation. It's so strategic."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huppakee@piefed.social 39 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I really dislike the narrative 'eu can't leave nato' / 'eu can't push back on the us because we need them. I'd really like to know:

  • how true this is
  • how much the people in control want to change this
  • how long it will take to change this

The eu can't allow itself to be treated like this, but also can't allow itself to be forced into a passive stance of having to agree. The eu needs to be able to stand up to this bully (and all the others).

[–] SapphireSphinx@feddit.org 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

'eu can’t push back on the us because we need them

The question is: For what do we need them?

They certainly will not respect Article 5 of the NATO treaty. They do not respect the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark. They will use any(!) leverage they have against us, no matter what we do. What do we get for playing nice? Nothing! If I look at Starmer, Merz, Kallas, ...., it looks like Chamberlain 2.0 and we know from experience that this will not work.

Maybe we buy some time but I do not see attempts to end the dependency. All I see is the hope that everything will be ok once Trump is gone. I doubt it.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The question is: For what do we need them?

For everyday life mostly payment processors and IT infrastructure. For both of them there's some change in the plans, but it's painfully slow and with the orange toddler it's a reasonable threat to assume that those might vanish from EU overnight if there's even moderate push for any change which he doesn't like.

Then there's obviously international trade, support for sanctions against Russia, support for Ukraine (whatever's left of it) and a ton of other things, but specially Visa and Mastercard are pretty important part of everyday life for Joe Averages around Europe.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

One word: gmail

Imagine the absolute IT and everyday life apocalypse if all european gmail users were no longer able to view their mails.

Outside of the usual, this possibility was the main push for me to migrate away from gmail.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

At least in here Microsoft cloud going out would be a order of magnitude bigger issue than any Google service. Also it's just not email/instant messaging, a ton of infrastructure on companies, financial and government, are dependent on AWS or Azure. Our team (and many others) could spin up replacement services relatively fast for basic email/file sharing/instant messaging but everything beyond that would be absolute pain in the rear.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'd imagine gmail would fuck with the average person more (which would then overload every company with support requests though), while microsoft services would screw the corporations. Didn't even think about how bad that would be.

Overall we're just completely fucked when it comes to IT infrastructure if the US really wants us to be.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

On a personal level that would be worse (in general, I personally don't use gmail/hotmail/outlook..), I agree. But in here governments, healthcare, insurance companies, banks and pretty much everything relies on US based tech at least somewhat, so all of that going away tomorrow would grind nearly the whole society down to a halt.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

For Ukraine support, the US isn't providing any directly I don't think. IIRC, the US has stopped all support but allows the sale of weapons to send to Ukraine. That's still useful, as Europe can only manufacture so much, but we aren't providing any funding anymore.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago

yes God forbid you can't buy loot boxes in your video games... better be colonized by a rapist pedophile

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

No sure, did not meant that the eu legally can't but indirectly is forced to stay because of the consequences.

Those consequences wouldn't only be military, the eu is fucked across the board if we say goodbye to our 'ally'.

Edit to clarify: i'm writing 'eu' but i guess it'd be factually better if i wrote 'the other nato-members'.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well nato membership isn't an eu thing. It's up to induvidual countries.

And they can leave, an exit protocol exists. More likely they mean "we are not ready to accept the implications of leaving"

The us thing is probably the dependancy of us produced weaponry

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

No sure, did not meant that the eu legally can't but indirectly is forced to stay because of the consequences.

Those consequences wouldn't only be military, the eu is fucked across the board if we say goodbye to our 'ally'.