this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
386 points (92.3% liked)

Europe

8399 readers
1486 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump has said the U.S. will revisit its stance on Greenland in the coming weeks.

Asked if he expected to take action on the territory, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday: "Let's talk about Venezuela, Russia, Ukraine. We'll worry about Greenland in about two months. Let's talk about Greenland in 20 days."

He added: "We need Greenland from a national security situation. It's so strategic."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it 53 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'm concerned he thinks he's able to take Greenland as easy as he was able to kidnap Maduro.

[–] Etnaphele@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I’m concerned that anybody could think such spearheaded attacks could bring anything but chaos. I agree on Greenland, kidnapping a high value target with a flashy operation has nothing to do with conquest. Successful US dominance was based on diplomacy, imo Trump overrates military supremacy once deprived of diplomatic credibility.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have thought for a long time that the chaos is the point. They're not trying to do something strategically smart. They are trying to diminish the credibility of the US. They are corruptly manipulating US markets with big crazy moves as a means of transferring wealth to their friends while also trying to weaken the US.

They started small to see what they could get away with and have been progressively getting more wild with the moves they make.

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 14 points 5 days ago

He’s destroying the US Dollar basically, passing it’s “power” to its own crypto-currencies. Yes, he’ll destroy the United States long term viability in the process, but hey…

[–] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 12 points 5 days ago

Don't know if true but also completely plausible.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago

I’m concerned that anybody could think such spearheaded attacks could bring anything but chaos.

What about the last 9 years has suggested to you that he wants anything but chaos?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago

military supremacy

it's not without limits though

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

For one, Trump's not thinking. You are ascribing thought and intentions to a man you and I would long ago have sent to the home were he our grandfather.

His handlers put these ideas in his head and soon enough they'll hand him invasion papers to sign. "Here are the orders you asked us to draw up." That easy.

Speaking of easy, taking Greenland will be all too easy. Europe didn't respond appropriately to the Russian threat in its own backyard; they're hardly going to cross the Pond to oust the strongest military on Earth. Fuck me, the EU is still mumbling about further Russian sanctions, after years of this conflict.

Stories like this are for preparing US citizens, and the world at large, for the coming reality.

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Won't it? Not like europe could stop it or we have to choose to go to war with them ig economically and ...physically? depends on usa, but they will rather give it up than start a war I bet

[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

He CAN take it far easier than Maduro. But the consequences would be far greater and it would be much harder to hold it.