this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025

158 points (98.2% liked)

Music

10685 readers

306 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - !music@lemmy.world

Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world

Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world

Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee

Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee

Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world

Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com

60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world

70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world

80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world

90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ruud@lemmy.world

felixwhynot@lemmy.world

EliYeet@lemmy.world

158

Meta: disallow AI-gen posts? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 day ago by felixwhynot@lemmy.world to c/music@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I noticed that AI posts tend to get reported so I figured maybe we just make them officially disallowed.

Agree/disagree? Post and tell us why!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

people are so knee-jerk at anything that isn’t 100% human made that they will care and demand anything that uses any kind of artificial intelligence or non human composed and played music be burned at the stake.

Maybe let's not presume how the community will behave given a new rule regarding generative AI. Music featuring digital instrumentation has certainly not been "burned at the stake" despite it not being "100% human made".

Music composed and performed by generative AI (which was trained on the works of other artists) would understandably be met with criticism within the music community, and is a far cry from "100% human made" in that it is closer to "0% human made".

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think once someone mentions "algorithm" or "I generated" it's over. People won't care about the details, because they're people.