this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
610 points (96.2% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

6298 readers
803 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Writers are not physicists, and the TOS Enterprise also had a few minutes above warp 10 at some point. It's whatever a set of 2-4 writers and 3-5 producers decided that week, and retconning the awkward bits later.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It’s whatever a set of 2-4 writers and 3-5 producers decided that week, and retconning the awkward bits later.

it is actually not, they had detailed manual for that. star trek was inconsistent or vague about lot of stuff (for example how their economic utopia works), but they usually tried to have their technobabble consistent.

they changed how the warp speed works between TOS and TNG.

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Warp_factor#Star_Trek:_The_Original_Series

(not saying there weren't exceptions, for example there were some really random numbers flying in the equinox double episode.)

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Then tell me what Tom Paris did in the Cochrane shuttlecraft ;)

That's my point. It's a standard until it's not for a convenient plot reason.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

TOS:

Warp factor 	speed (c) 	travelled in 24 hours (ly) 	Earth to Alpha Centauri

9 	729 	1.996 	52.07 hours
10 	1000 	2.738 	37.96 hours
11 	1331 	3.644 	28.52 hours 

from TNG forward:

9 	1516 	4.15 	25.03 hours
10 	∞ 	∞ 	0 

the lizard babies episode, however absurd, is in line with this.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Cool.

Now tell me about all the newfangled quantum slip stream, etc. that varied writers came up with since TNG in Disco and whatever. Ones that avoid the TNG warp 10 limit.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

not relevant to your original claim, which was answered and set straight.

warp number higher than 10 in the TOS is not a proof of "set of writers doing whatever they felt like". (shown above). whatever technology other than warp someone came up with 30 years later can hardly have an effect on the warp number in TOS.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No, you're not understanding. Warp 10 is a symptom of the overall issue.

The rare occasional exception meant that despite the Warp 10 "limit," writers still wrote exceptions because "woah, too fast!" is still a solid Trek plot. Eventually, even the Warp system proved too confining. Wormholes were suddenly everywhere. DS9 was based on that premise. Voyager especially are where writers really pushed back against 1987 made up rules based on what seemed to make sense at the time.

So, to get back to the losey-goosey TOS era of self-defined techno babbel, the entire warp system was effectively depreciated and new systems brought in with new shows. Magical tardigrades making ad hoc wormholes and the like.

Star Trek does not have to obey laws of physics. Everything is whatever humans want it to be. Because it's scifi. It's a story, not science.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

No, you’re not understanding.

you are the one who don't understand. you said something, it was not true, i showed you why. end of story.

there could be warp above 10 in TOS and it did not contradict anything, because it was within the parameters they set.

they decided to change that in TNG and they stayed withing the changed parameters. they made one bad warp 10 story in voyager that was still within these parameters - it still did not contradict anything.

they introduced some other means in the future, like slipstream and fucking fungi drive, which are just irrelevant to the warp factor.

in fact the only one i can think of that was out of line was the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_No_One_Has_Gone_Before - but again - not really relevant to my comment "warp 10+ in TOS was fine and not a contradiction"

if you are arguing just for the sake of arguing, go find another sparring partner

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I never was making that claim, just that the person I replied to say going above 10 was dangerous

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but I'm saying that any thought or concern about a canon transwarp limit is at risk of being dashed by the whims of people looking for a plot device.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Oh for sure, warp factors and the limits thereof can be bent to fit a particular story

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At some point in the cannon they decided warp 10 is the transwarp limit. They ignored it a couple of times.