this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
366 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

78002 readers
2281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] warm@kbin.earth 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It was a flop because no one really wants thinner phones, they are harder to use. The iPhone Air was also extremely overpriced and missing basic features a phone a quarter of the price has.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, those are all great points that make up a good portion of why they should probably revisit the design.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Or maybe stop trying to make expensive electronics as thin as possible.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Thin is fine. But you should use that newly free space for a bigger battery. It fits better in people's hands that way too.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 6 hours ago

Exactly, and it's easier to make them user serviceable that way too.

I've never understood the desire to make $1k+ electronics super thin, but then again I step on things a lot. I guess the fragility could be a form of planned obsolescence.