this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
635 points (98.5% liked)
AntiTrumpAlliance
1276 readers
280 users here now
About
An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.
Rules
-No pro-Trump posts or comments
-No off topic posts
-Be civil
-No trolling
-Follow Lemmy terms of service
Social Media
Other Communities
!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Who else would call a santa hotline?
Yes, but the implication that he heard 8 years old + thought to still call her beautiful and cute. Not that he made a gaff and was then informed.
Bro he talked about his toddler daughters boobs on live TV this isn't surprising.
Have you never heard an 8 year old child called 'cute' or 'beautiful' in a nonsexual way? I'm not saying that was Trump's intention or not, but given there's actual allegations of him raping a 13 year old, maybe we should focus on that rather than easily misinterpreted statements?
Well that's the thing, when you have a known pedophile say shit like this, that fact tends to affect how those things get interpreted.
Yes, in person from a family member. Not from a stranger hearing a voice of a child for the first time. This isn't a phone sex line and is NORAD's Santa line as stated.
This event is building into the overall narrative of Trump. Yes, he probably did rape a 13 year old and my comments aren't taking away from that. This is a sign of this thought process. He hears a child, visualizes the child, and makes a creepy remark that he feels is ok.
And like you say: even if in this case he might not have intended it to sound creepy, him being a stranger saying this to a child instantly makes it creepy.
Do you not see how this is relevant to the raping of the 13 year old? If he creeps on little girls now, it's more evidence that he did back then
My God that is a strange perspective.
That child rapist does not need you defending him, I promise.
Congratulations, you just defended a pedo without any good reason. You failed so completely at recognising context and objective facts that the only thing you managed to do is show everyone that you're either a pedo apologist, so fucking dumb you shouldn't be able to write or both of those things.