this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
141 points (78.8% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8329 readers
437 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] audible_obituary@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

All art is subjective, imo. Just because you didn't like what she was doing musically doesn't mean it's automatically bad. Also, I think art that prompts a discussion around whether it's art or not is very, very important.

That said, I can't comment on her character, so I'll have to take your word on it that she was crappy to Lennon's kid / the people around her.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

When you’re interrupting your husband and Chuck Berry singing together by screeching into an adjacent mic impromptu when your only job was to play tambourine, your “art” is objectively bad.

And her reprehensible treatment of Lennon’z son is well documented, you can Google it.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

All art is subjective, imo. Just because you didn't like what she was doing musically doesn't mean it's automatically bad

If art is subjective, then that's exactly what it means. Their subjective experience is that they didn't like it, so to them it's bad. And you're in no position to argue with someone's opinion on a subjective topic.

Edit: they're/ their

[–] pastaq@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I agree with you, but so does the person you're responding to. I think you're missing the semantic argument they were making that criticized the absolutist language used to describe Yoko's artistic endeavors. They were highlighting that the term "objectively garbage" was in reference to something inherently subjective.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

That said, I can't comment on her character,

Yoko described herself as a bad mother who twice abandoned her child in search of fame.

https://www.imaginepeace.com/archives/10408#%3A%7E%3Atext=For+years%2C+Yoko+didn%27t%2C%27+And+he+was+right.%E2%80%9D

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Taking a shit in a zip lock bag, or duct taping a banana to a wall is not art.

It's fucking lazy, pretentious, bullshit.

A literal circle jerk.

Not everything has to be Monet or Robert Frost, but there HAS to be a vehicle of creation, a filter passing through the artist.

Screaming obnoxious sounds and saying it is singing, or placing a random object on a surface is not art or commentery, ESPECIALLY when the discussion is focused on "what is art".

Art can be proactive, controversial, or just a simple expression. But it has to have a purpose outside of "is it art?".

Otherwise everyone claiming AI slop is not art, is a hypocrite.

[–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

Taking a shit in a zip lock bag, or duct taping a banana to a wall is not art.

The fact that you're upset about this kind of art means it's working :)

It’s fucking lazy, pretentious, bullshit.

You don't know the thought process that lead to it.


Now where did I put those ziplock bags?

[–] postcapitalism@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you don’t know much about this person why are you arguing?

[–] audible_obituary@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Because I think it's ridiculous to dismiss someone for having "bad art" when I don't really think that's a thing. I got no stake in the game, be upset about Yoko Ono if you want, but her art gets people talking and I think that's worth something.

[–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

LMAO, there's no "bad art"? Ever saw a Hitler painting, Liefield's pouches, or a conservative movie production?

Saying "there's no bad art" is like saying there's no objectively bad tasting stuff. Which there is.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Kirk Cameron would like a word you about his more recent works...