Can any human domestication guide fans confirm whether this is accurate?
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
151 points (97.5% liked)
196
5088 readers
2350 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Independent xenosophonts do have political rights and means of production are collectively owned and managed. It's only florets that don't have political rights. In some cases florets have say over means of production as well, at least the ones that actually do any production as many don't work at all. Affini can also be florets. Again I don't think you have actually read that much HDG. You could argue that florets are an underclass. However most florets are also volunteers and have some very explicit rights in the story. In fact Affini are bound by those rights to look after florets more than they look after independents or each other. I really don't think you can compare the Affini to Israel who are doing a genocide given the Affini avoid killing at all costs and respect local languages and even traditions provided they aren't harmful.
Yes the Affini compact would not at all work in real life and anyone who tried it would end up committing some form of abuse. I am not trying to argue it's realism here. You are however completely and seemingly deliberately ignoring what it actually is and how it's described by the various authors.
I'm not talking about florets, I'm talking about everyone who isn't Affini. No civilization is permitted to self-govern without Affini interference.
Basically, you're free to self-govern as a vassal of the compact as long as you do what you're told and don't want independence. That's not freedom. That's not political rights. That's abuse. Guess what, black slaves who did what their masters told them were treated better too, but that doesn't mean they had freedom.
I have little experience with HDG, but I'm afraid you have little understanding of what communism and freedom mean, and that's far more important. So far we have not disagreed on the facts of the fiction. We've only disagreed on the facts of political systems and ethics.
I do in fact believe the Affini are entirely benevolent. They are also wrong. They are monsters who mean well.
Yes they are an imperialist empire. I never said otherwise. What I was saying is they are not fascist nor are they capitalist. They aren't necessarily feudalist either.
As for political rights: you have as much political freedom as you do in current "democracies". Which is to say as an individual you can't change much at all. Take the USA for example, individuals don't choose the laws they live under, states can make some laws but are limited in their power and self-governence. If a state tried to leave they probably wouldn't be allowed to and it would probably lead to civil war and them being recaptured. That's basically what the Terran Protectorate is in the Affini compact. It's a state in the larger compact with limited self-governance. Terrans can vote in larger elections in the larger Affini compact much like they can vote for things in the Terran protectorate. Arguably they are more free under the compact than they were in the Terran accord or current day society as the Affini compact does not have rich oligarchs who control everything. Means of production are owned by both Affini and independents.
Forcing other states to become their vassels is definitely an imperialist thing to do, but in this case it doesn't really remove the rights of the individuals only the rights of governments. I think that's an important thing to understand.
I would argue that the possibility of forced Domestication as well as all the psychic manipulation is the real serious issue with the compact in terms of freedom. The privileges afforded to only Affini such as the ability to take florets are another serious issue. You could very well call those things abuse. In terms of government and economics they are pretty free by comparison.
Only to the extent permitted by the Affini. You must understand, in Medieval Europe, most men over 30 had practical ownership of their means of production. Take a farmer as an example. As a young man you would work as a farmhand on an older farmer's land, and your future wife-to-be would work as a milkmaid. Once you've both completed your apprenticeships, you would marry, and you would receive a dowry from your wife's family which would permit you to inherit or establish your own farm. The land would be yours to work, and you would profit by your own labours and those of your family.
But the land would also be owned by the local lord, in much the same way that a modern corporate farm "owns" land that is also owned by the local government. The local baron would extract taxes from you as tithe for allowing you to work his land. You would be the only peasant permitted to work it; you would have sovereign domain with respect to other peasants, but the threat of state violence would ensure your efforts benefitted your superior.
The land and tools afforded to "independent" vassals of the Affini compact are permitted to be used with a great deal of freedom, but the threat of violence is implicit in the arrangement. The Affini are master. That is why I say the Affini follow a feudalist economic model. The Affini have a monopoly on the use of legitimised violence. De Facto, even if not De Jure, they own everything. The Compact is about as "communist" as the USSR, or modern China.