this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
-45 points (36.5% liked)

Selfhosted

60693 readers
392 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did I just brick my SAS drive?

I was trying to make a pool with the other 5 drives and this one kept giving errors. As a completer beginner I turned to gpt.....

What can I do? Is that drive bricked for good?

Don't clown on me, I understand my mistake in running shell scripts from Ai...

EMPTY DRIVES NO DATA

The initial error was:

Edit: sde and SDA are the same drive, name just changed for some reason And also I know it was 100% my fault and preventable ๐Ÿ˜ž

**Edit: ** from LM22, output of sudo sg_format -vv /dev/sda (broken link)

BIG EDIT:

For people that can help (btw, thx a lot), some more relevant info:

Exact drive model: SEAGATE ST4000NM0023 XMGG

HBA model and firmware: lspci | grep -i raid 00:17.0 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation SATA Controller [RAID mode] Its an LSI card Bought it here

Kernel version / distro: I was using Truenas when I formatted it. Now trouble shooting on other PC got (6.8.0-38-generic), Linux Mint 22

Whether the controller supports DIF/DIX (T10 PI): output of lspci -vv (broken link)

Whether other identical drives still work in the same slot/cable: yes all the other 5 drives worked when i set up a RAIDZ2 and a couple of them are exact same model of HDD

COMMANDS This is what I got for each command: (broken link)


Solved by y0din! Thank you soo much!


Thanks for all the help ๐Ÿ˜

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] squaresinger@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I had a problem with Fedora 42, where the performance of my games would be fine one day and abysmal another day. Couldn't find a pattern. I googled a ton, tried to debug myself, asked on reddit, stackexchange, the fedora forum and lemmy. I only got answers like "Works fine on my machine, noob" and "I have that problem too". It only affected games running in proton on heroic, everything else was fine.

After about a year of on-and-off debugging and asking around, I swallowed my pride and asked ChatGPT.

First answer from that thing was correct: I had run dnf update without doing a flatpak update right afterwards. Turns out, flatpak has its own copy of Nvidia drivers and if the system driver is updated without the flatpak copy being updated, it falls back to software rendering. So the performance was crap until I did flatpak update the next time, and broke again when I ran dnf update.

I still haven't found that in any documentation so far.

AI is crap more often than not, but it does at least try to help and sometimes it actually does.

Look in this thread here. Is there even a single answer that tries to help OP, or is every single answer here just dumb snark?

[โ€“] Brewchin@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's true that people on the internet can be dicks. Even more so technical people (and that's not limited to online: those online dicks are usually IRL dicks when taking technical stuff). But that's a hurdle, not a barrier.

There's little anyone here can do to help OP, as they (if I understand it correctly) have already irreparably nuked their hardware. The current problem is significantly different and harder than the original problem. Asking randos on this community is unlikely to yield results. Hence the focus on variations of "Now... what did we learn? ๐Ÿคจ"

I'm not trying to help, as I'm not familiar enough with SAS nor the current problem. The same is likely true of others here.

[โ€“] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

The only evidence that OP irreparably nuked their hardware is ChatGPTs word.

The bigger issue ad hand is that everyone here is a noob when it comes to exotic hardware like SAS, and still everyone here thinks they are 1337 haxors enough to tell OP that they are a noob idiot.

Tbh, if OP asks for help here and there's 49 comments of people being dicks and one that actually helps it might be worthwhile. But as it stands it's 50 to 0, with nobody here beeing educated enough to know anything about the subject.

[โ€“] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

I love how you ignore all the comments that actually tried to help OP. Or maybe you posted early on but you can't be bothered to go back and edit your response. And then you pretend that AI tries to help us do anything, as if it had motivation or volition. Come on now.