this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
136 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

4957 readers
150 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At this rate, finding the last digit is probably just a few years down the road.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I think there's proofs to show that won't happen. Don't ask me to find them or explain them, it's beyond my scope.

What I'm waiting for is them finding a repeating sequence of 1s and 0s that when arranged in a matrix form a crude circle. A message to those who can learn to find it, with more to follow.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 4 days ago

Movie was pretty good. Book was excellent.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

Can't be repeating, but there could be some sort of non-repeating pattern as far as we know

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean if pi is infinite, wouldn't that happen anyway at some point?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a given. It's just like there are different sizes of infinite, and more numbers between 0 and 1 than there are real numbers, or something.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's really interesting, and matches my completely groundless intuition. Just because it could happen, even on an infinite scale, doesn't mean it would. That makes sense to me at least.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I mean math and even science aren't always intuitive, so we have to have rules and theories to go by that demonstrate repeatability. Subatomic physics doesn't even really work like our models say, it's just that the models give the best results in predicting what we'll find.

Another example is randomness. Not all random numbers are the same, it depends on how you derive them as to what you'll get. I guess in some way that's related to what numbers will pop up for an irrational number. It's said with enough monkeys randomly typing on typewriters eventually you'll get a Shakespeare work. It already happened a number of times... since we're in sense monkeys and got a number of Shakespeare works. Didn't even need typewriters.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

So it basically still boils down to a question of determinism vs, well, not free will but, I guess "indeterminism" would be a word for it. Semantics kind of break down at explaining the nature of existence at some point. I wonder if that is true for mathematics as well.

It's like that quote of Alfred Korzybski's, "the map is not the terrain". The explanation is not reality, it must by necessity be something less, or something different from it.