this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
937 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

9955 readers
2128 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In b4 someone calls me a tankie

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, they are not ideologically communist. A ruling party is by definition not communist. They are diometrically opposed.

Even having an identifiable "owning class", let alone anything close to a "ruling class" is also definitionally not communist.

[–] aski3252@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No, they are not ideologically communist. A ruling party is by definition not communist. They are diometrically opposed.

Being ideologically communist simply means that you believe the ideal society is a communist society. Theoretically, you could be the king of britain and still be a communist.

I'm sure there are many people who are members of communist parties who are not actual communists, but there are some true believers who think they are working towards a communist society in the far future by building up state power in order to "compete" with capitalist/imperialist forces.

Again, I doubt their methods will work. I don't think you can work towards a stateless society by strenghtening the state. But I'm not gonna deny their ideals because I don't like their approach.