this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
224 points (99.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35757 readers
3898 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Just as a tangent:

This is one reason why I'll never trust AI.

I imagine we might wrangle the hallucination thing (or at least be more verbose about it's uncertainty), but I doubt it will ever identify a poorly chosen question.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Making the LLMs warn you when you ask a known bad question is just a matter of training it differently. It's a perfectly doable thing, with a known solution.

Solving the hallucinations in LLMs is impossible.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's because it's a false premise. LLMs don't hallucinate, they do exactly what they're meant to do; predict text, and output something that's legible and human written. There's no training for correctness, how do you even define that?

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There’s no training for correctness, how do you even define that?

I guess can chat to these guys who are trying:

By scaling reasoning with reinforcement learning that rewards correct final answers, LLMs have improved from poor performance to saturating quantitative reasoning competitions like AIME and HMMT in one year

https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Math-V2

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, when it comes to mathematics you can do that with extreme limitations on success, but what about cases where correctness is less set? Two opposing statements can be correct if a situation changes, for example.

The problems language models are expected to solve go beyond the scope of what language models are good for. They’ll never be good at solving such problems.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

i duno you’re in the wrong forum, you want hackernews or reddit, no one here knows much about ai

although you do seem to be making the same mistake others made before where you want point to research happening currently and then extrapolating that out to the future

ai has progressed so fast i wouldn’t be making any “they’ll never be good at” type statements