this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
760 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
2029 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In late October, Elon Musk released a Wikipedia alternative, with pages written by his AI chatbot Grok. Unlike its nearly quarter-century-old namesake, Musk said Grokipedia would strip out the “woke” from Wikipedia, which he previously described as an “extension of legacy media propaganda.” But while Musk’s Grokipedia, in his eyes, is propaganda-free, it seems to have a proclivity toward right-wing hagiography.

Take Grokipedia’s entry on Adolf Hitler. Until earlier this month, the entry read, “Adolf Hitler was the Austrian-born Führer of Germany from 1933 to 1945.” That phrase has been edited to “Adolf Hitler was an Austrian-born German politician and dictator,” but Grok still refers to Hitler by his honorific one clause later, writing that Hitler served as “Führer und Reichskanzler from August 1934 until his suicide in 1945.” NBC News also pointed out that the page on Hitler goes on for some 13,000 words before the first mention of the Holocaust.

Archive: http://archive.today/aEcz0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lefthandeddude@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Musk is clearly a Nazi.

First, there's the Nazi salute. There's no reason to do that unless you are a Nazi.

Second, Nazis called Hitler my Furer, and he's rewriting it this way specifically for this reason. It is an honorific title and he's showing honor to Hitler.

Third, Musk deflects from accusations he's a Nazi ("that's a crazy thing to say") but he never responds by saying "What Hitler did was horrible and I'm not a Nazi and detest their ideology" which is what someone would say if not a Nazi.

The scary thing about this is Musk will soon control a large robot army. At that point, he could appoint white supremacists to lead the robot army and pick up where Hitler left off. This is a real threat for Jewish people as well as other minorities.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

A robot army that will all self drive!!

Elon is so smart, bet there is some 6D Polytopia behind his plummeting (-50% in Europe) tesla sales.

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Third, Musk deflects from accusations he’s a Nazi (“that’s a crazy thing to say”) but he never responds by saying “What Hitler did was horrible and I’m not a Nazi and detest their ideology” which is what someone would say if not a Nazi.

This is the most important point, IMO. Fascists who want mainstream acceptance know not to have swastika tattoos and not to openly say they love Hitler. They will always try to have some plausible deniability. Don't get dragged into their bullshit arguments. There's no point in debating whether the nazi salute was some other motion that was misinterpreted. Even if it was, the first thing a non-nazi would do would be to clarify that they are not a nazi and don't want nazis to think they're their allies. Even if Musk had completely inadvertently stumbled upon the love and support of the nazis via a series of misunderstandings (lol), at this point in time he is deliberately choosing to be part of them.

Here is Musk at 3:08:01 saying he's not a nazi... and then going on to say you're not a nazi unless you're literally invading Poland and doing the holocaust. That is literally the only objectionable thing about the nazis. Not their "fashion sense or mannerisms". Yes that was a direct quote. There is really only one type of person that would not mention as objectionable the nazi ideology or all the acts of violence that are not at the same scale as the holocaust.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"I'm not a Nazi, I just like the esthetics of someone else's blood on my black uniform"

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

And all of the sycophantic muskanites love licking his boots.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago

Most people do, feeling of power or at least positive connection to someone's feeling of power are very intoxicating. I even wonder how many 16 years old girls you knew when you were in high school. No justice or mercy there if you try to keep moral high ground and ignore that component. (I did, LOL.)

The thing about Nazis is that they've lost, so one could get pretty believable feeling of power from their own military and patriotic aesthetic in most of the western nations and socialist bloc, while Nazis would be something of that past with fraktur lettering and stylish evil. A bit like vampires.

Now, today both western and Soviet patriotic aesthetic have kinda rotten. The Soviet kind is associated with murderous madness between two strongest former members, the western kind is associated with paying 20x the right money to kill brown people in their homeland without even getting their oil in the end.

While Nazis, eh, lost. So haven't lived till now and are remembered young and cute, so to say.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's just an edgelord. He thinks he's funny and edgy and everyone wants to be his friend. Inside he's a scared little boy who wants his daddy to love him but his daddy is a nazi who hates him.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

do you know that you can an edglord doing nazi shit? a nazi. no matter the motivation, he's still a nazi.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one -5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I did know that. But I think you give him more credit of self-awareness than he has. Elon Musk is a vacuous ego with a lot of money. I don't believe he has the depth of mind to actually hold any political ideology, for good or ill. I think he is singularly focused on being the Best Boy, and will ape anything that helps him feel that way.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

You're probably right. He was the lib-left's Best Boy a few years back, was gonna solve climate change and do cool science shit and whatever, but then I forget what exactly happened but he kinda swung the other direction.

Motivation probably doesn't matter too much. It just highlights the systemic problem of allowing one person to have that much money-power.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

You make it sound as if Naziism is a political ideology and not just a hate cult. everyone who is a nazi because of self serving reasons is still a nazi, even if they are stupid or so drugged that one might question if they have any agency. they are still nazis.

Most nazis are really stupid and irrational and don't need a reason either, still nazis.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 4 points 22 hours ago

even edgelord vacuous nazis are just that: nazis. No matter the reason, or if it's meant "ironically", they're a nazi. There's no excusing it, or softening it, they're a full blown nazi.

He did the nazi salute on stage, at least twice, he holds extreme right-wing and white supremacist views, he is a nazi.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

He's a lot more than that

[–] T156@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don't think he is one, not really.

I think he wants to be one, but isn't one himself, which is perhaps sadder.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Isn't "Furer" just the German word for leader? I'm pretty sure the word existed before Hitler and the Nazis I don't think they invented it.

[–] groet@feddit.org 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The word Führer is 99% used for Hitler. There are many variants that are OK to use though. Most notably Anführer (if Führer is leader, Anführer would be "the one who leads ahead") which is the common word to use for leader. Others are composites like Bergführer (mountain guide).

The swastica also existed before the nazis but is now forever tainted.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

The swastica also existed before the nazis but is now forever tainted.

It's still widely in use in India, with the original connotations

technically yes. but no. it clearly means leader with nazi connotations. you with call a German mayor a fuhrer?

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 22 hours ago

correct, just like how the swastika was originally not a hate symbol. But nowadays, Germans would not refer to anyone as "Führer", unless they're (neo)nazis.