this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
503 points (99.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

27534 readers
227 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The name of the format makes me think it's regular jpeg, but bigger. Wouldn't it be better to be smaller? ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] Sunrosa@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

In my personal tests of jxl, it manages filesizes 1/9th that of png while remaining visually identical (unless looking VERY closely). It's a massive improvement over jpeg and honestly a replacement for png in most cases.

Like I'm saying 8MB for a 8000x6000 file at max quality (estimating from memory)

[โ€“] bhamlin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's even more confusing than that; the X is for revision 10, and the L is for long term.

It's an update to the JPEG standard intended to cover expected future uses and capabilities.

[โ€“] Brahvim@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[โ€“] Cort@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

No. They increased the max "canvas" size and increased encoding efficiency. You'd want the file size to be smaller but the file itself to be larger (and consequently more detailed)