this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
27 points (90.9% liked)

UK Politics

4513 readers
36 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This will kill EV adoption, just to put it into perspective this is the equivalent of an average ICE car (38.6MPG) having 25.5p added per litre of fuel, in a single budget.

The even more ridiculous thing is plug in hybrids are 1.5p per mile, so people with 80+ miles of range in their Golfs etc. will pay half price, even though they are needlessly dragging around an internal combustion engine for 99% of their journeys.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@TIN I agree with your last point: the per-mile setup should apply to all vehicles according to size and weight if it is truly for road wear. Pollution can then be captured separately according to fuel source. Unfortunately the government has been too toothless to increase fuel duty for years.
Regarding your other point: yes! I think councils should run permit charging like resident parking: if you have a resident permit you can charge in council car parks for £x.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

the per-mile setup should apply to all vehicles according to size and weight if it is truly for road wear.

Why would it be for road wear specifically? That's not the current situation (as indicated by the fact that vehicles with lower emissions pay less), and none of it is hypothecated for road-specific funding anyway.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

@HermitBee because that's why Reeves said electric vehicles should pay per mile. She announced it by saying "Because all cars contribute to the wear and tear on our roads, I will ensure that drivers are taxed according to how much they drive, not just by the type of car they use.”
I'm not saying this particularly carries through to how roads are funded; I'm saying if this claim *is* the reason to tax EVs then the tax should be structured differently.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago

Ah fair. I didn't listen to the words that went with the policy, because they are usually in direct opposition to it. Like how she didn't just raise income tax.