292
Cut the Failed Red States Loose: Why America Can't Keep Carrying the Dead Weight
(cmarmitage.substack.com)
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
292 points (88.8% liked)
politics
26464 readers
2415 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So. NO. This is what we are fighting against. We need to make a society where everyone can be included, happy, heallthy, and free. Not just exclude those we don't currently agree with.
Many of these hard core MAGA people are like super fans of a sports team. They are looking for something to identify as and a group to be part of. Give them better options and they wouldn't exist.
The problem is that you can't separate most of MAGA from the hate. If a black person in Mississippi benefits from a federal state service, that cannot be tolerated, even if many whites benefit as well.
It's more important to protect a non-viable embryo, according to these people, than to protect the mother's life or health.
I feel like King Theoden from LotR, who says "What can men do against such reckless hate?" Though, it's valid to substitute "hatred" with "stupidity"
That is all true and yet we still need to offer better options than a civil war.
Billionaire Burgers?
Shareholder Shortribs?
Capitalist Casserole?
There are several sets of people involved. First you have the ambitious. These are poloticians and such that probably aren't really racist at the core, but are willing to act and be racist to get ahead. They are the real problem. But it isn't hate that drives them. It's ambition. For the people suffering, that doesn't matter. But when it comes to solving the problem it does.
Then you have the people who are actually racist, hateful people. They do exist, but they are actually a very small minority. The rest are "followers". They weren't racist until someone convinced them to be. These are the people you can give better options to. Doing so errodes the power of the other two groups.
These followers aren't being told black and white. They are be told lazy, or criminal. And when the ambitious people shut services, they don't mention the "good" people who benefit, they only mention the bad people. So often followers don't even know who is really losing out. The news is full of trump supporters who are unhappy that a local to them person they knew got picked up by ICE. That's because they believed the propaganda that it would only be violent illegal immigrants and such. Some were just fooled. But a lot just idolize trump because he filled a place in thier life that was empty. Give them something better, and they won't idolize him. And idolization causes a lot of people to believe illogical things.
Sufficient hate or stupidity, is indistinguishable from the other.
Nope, fuck maga. i have no sympathy for nazis. they want to hate everything and everyone, let them be miserable in their little hate worlds.
There are several sets of people involved. First you have the ambitious. These are politicians and such that probably aren't really racist at the core, but are willing to act and be racist to get ahead. They are the real problem. But it isn't hate that drives them. It's ambition. For the people suffering, that doesn't matter. But when it comes to solving the problem it does.
Then you have the people who are actually racist, hateful people. They do exist, but they are actually a very small minority. The rest are "followers". They weren't racist until someone convinced them to be. These are the people you can give better options to. Doing so errodes the power of the other two groups.
I have no sympathy for the two groups that aren't the followers.
You realize you think like them and they think like you, right? Dehumanizing someone unequivocally and wishing ill upon them is the easy and default human condition you find yourself living in right now.
i do realize that and it weighs on me, and i hate it, but i refuse to tolerate intolerance.
I am fully willing to have rational conversations with maga, but after trying 100s of times and making no progress, i see no reason to continue with the olive branch. i would have better luck teaching my dog mandrin, than making maga see reason or have empathy.
Exactly. Some of these people are literally our fucking parents, and even they refuse to listen to reason.
They are lost.
It's a fascinating social construct: Once enough chronological years are accumulated, expertise is expected. Obviously though, points at everything, that's a fallacy. They're literally clinically retarded. It's uncouthe to fight the retarded.
Historically, the mongers of violence and war have only been ended by stronger violence and better war strategies and resources. The whole take the higher road and tolerance thing is what got America into this current mess in the first place. These assholes are cowards and only come out when there are no consequences, but go back into hiding when there are.
People should not be punched in the nose for their race, religion, sexuality, gender, etc., basically who they are. People should be punched in the noise for being assholes, their bad behaviour.
There are several sets of people involved. First you have the ambitious. These are poloticians and such that probably aren't really racist at the core, but are willing to act and be racist to get ahead. They are the real problem. But it isn't hate that drives them. It's ambition. For the people suffering, that doesn't matter. But when it comes to solving the problem it does.
Then you have the people who are actually racist, hateful people. They do exist, but they are actually a very small minority. The rest are "followers". They weren't racist until someone convinced them to be. These are the people you can give better options to. Doing so errodes the power of the other two groups.
But where we are now... I feel like you might be right about a need for responding in kind. But, while doing so, remembering that overall, the follower group is not an enemy that should be eradicated, but one that showed be turned to a better side. So it's kind of like making sure you don't box them in and give them no way out but to fight. You need the followers to join you while you overpower the other two groups. And after, you need to make sure the followers have better options so that they don't join up with the next popularist to appear.
Ah, the age-old dilemma: is it morally sound and/or necessary to dehumanize dehumanizers?
And if we're honest, isn't dehumanizing people a very human trait?
Or put my favorite way: "No one hates like family."
I didn't see any dehumanization in the comment you're replying to
Straight up bullshit. They've been given better options over and over. They are small, hateful people.
There are several sets of people involved. First you have the ambitious. These are poloticians and such that probably aren't really racist at the core, but are willing to act and be racist to get ahead. They are the real problem. But it isn't hate that drives them. It's ambition. For the people suffering, that doesn't matter. But when it comes to solving the problem it does.
Then you have the people who are actually racist, hateful people. They do exist, but they are actually a very small minority. The rest are "followers". They weren't racist until someone convinced them to be. These are the people you can give better options to. Doing so errodes the power of the other two groups.
far too apologetic of racists.
Not apologizing for anyone. No one is born racist. Someone or some people convince them to be. That's just a fact. Not very controversial really.