this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
514 points (99.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

8185 readers
857 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A New Jersey woman who was found bound with zip ties in the woods and marked with a derogatory phrase referencing President Donald Trump is now accused of staging the attack.

Natalie Greene, 26, is charged with conspiracy to convey false statements and hoaxes and making false statements to federal law enforcement.

According to court documents, Greene and a co-conspirator called 911 late July 23 and claimed that three men had attacked them on a trail at the Egg Harbor Township Nature Reserve. The co-conspirator told dispatchers the men referenced Greene by name and mentioned her job in politics. According to reports, Greene previously worked for a Republican congressman.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YeahToast@aussie.zone 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, and people who did that are fucking psychos.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world -2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And those are "your" people. The same people who say the shooter was a right wing loon, are the same people who celebrate what he did. You know, like the other person who is currently replying to me...

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

When you choose to paint with that wide of a brush, you're setting yourself up to make false examples of hypocrisy. Do you have any evidence that the person who's currently replying to you celebrated the killers actions?

I noticed that you suddenly understood nuance when accused of idolizing Charlie kirk.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

.... Seriously?

I’m not involved, and I’m not American. But I laughed when I heard he was shot.

Most of the world laughed. He was a ghoul, so it was fitting.

I’m still glad he’s dead.

Replies you would have seen, had you not been running head long into trying to be smart...

I noticed that you suddenly understood nuance when accused of idolizing Charlie kirk.

Actually, thats my point. That you lot dont understand nuance. You all dismiss this guy as being left wing, as though it would be some reflection on you. When thats just not true. Its like saying "all men are rapists". Its dumb, but people say it because some men are. This is the point Ive been trying to get at. That you are all being weird as fuck about the guy being left wing, like it matters at all. Its a weird fucking hill to die on. Especially from a nation of dumb witted morons who think they are left wing...

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Who do you think I was talking about when I said "the person you were currently talking to"?

That you lot dont understand nuance.

They said, without knowing what fucking lot I'm in. Jesus Christ you just bucket everyone that's says something you don't like into one group, but when it comes to yourself you understand the concept of individuals. Then you go around and complain about "you lot" not understanding nuance. Do you see the hypocrisy in your actions?

Did I say anything to you to cast me into "you lot", besides just saying something you dislike? Can you define what that lot is?

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Dear fucking god, I didnt realise you needed the special crayons to understand basic fucking English.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago

Cute. Answer the questions.