this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
571 points (99.3% liked)

World News

50886 readers
1898 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

within Canada against Canadians, and within America against the substantial chunk of Americans who would be trying to bring down the regime that was causing something as insane as an invasion of Canada to be undertaken.

Given the current trajectory, I have little faith that they would mount an effective internal resistance.

I think we’d do not badly in a conventional war when you factor in

No matter what, conventional war is horrific and wed be losing our families, homes, friends, and more. Effective strategic deterrents make it such that we would never reach that stage and as such, is far more economical and moral.

I do think a nuclear deterrent would be ideal, but that’s a couple of steps of escalation further down the line I think.

You cant make nukes loudly in such a situation, but as we've seen, you definitely cant make them under the gun. The only time is before the circumstances that you feel would necessitate them when we are still not viewed as enemies.

Disarming yourself as to avoiding presenting as a threat clearly does not work.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No matter what, conventional war is horrific and wed be losing our families, homes, friends, and more.

Which is why I said "preventing America from invading in the first place would be ideal"

You cant make nukes loudly in such a situation, but ass we've seen, you definitely cant make them under the gun.

Right, it would be done before the US invades, to prevent them from invading. Nuclear weapons are deterrence, you don't want to actually use them.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Right, it would be done before the US invades, to prevent them from invading. Nuclear weapons are deterrence, you don’t want to actually use them.

I fear my point is being missed.

My point was in response mainly to this last sentence:

I do think a nuclear deterrent would be ideal, but that’s a couple of steps of escalation further down the line I think.

My point is that it cant be further down, because if you are down that far, its too late. We've seen this was most countries that became under the gun when they would benefit dearly from having nuclear weapons of their own.

Notably, if Ukraine did so before they would have been fine, but during, they have no chance.

Iran similarly has a difficult time.

Its not about the nation, its about the fact that if you are at a point where you feel the heat is on, its too late to build nukes. Now is the time to build them.

[–] LOLseas@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What's sad, is that Ukraine did have nukes. Then this happened in '94: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum Guess who is now a bully.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

It should be noted that they were never actually their nukes (not their codes or delivery systems), but that this would have been a good time for them to make their own nukes.