this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
549 points (93.8% liked)

Science Memes

17377 readers
1003 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Nah I think OP is right. Googling around the story seems mostly made up for bragging points. It also started as religious school not sciences 100% and probably did more harm than good for women's rights considering Morocco is at the very fucking bottom (137th).

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Interesting that googling would take precedence over UNESCO or Guinness in a science community of all places. Guinness particularly is known to have rigorous quality standards.

I'm going to trust actual organizations with institutional standards over a Google search. That's just me though. Other readers can draw their own conclusions.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I trust UNESCO, but isn't Guinness basically pay-to-play, like if I got together with my entire city and we baked the world's largest pizza, verified by a number of neutral third parties but I don't pay the $$$ to bring the Guinness team, according to them it doesn't count?

[–] skeuomorphology@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The UNESCO claim seems to be false, too. There is no mention of al-Qarawiyyin in UNESCO's description of the Medina of Fez: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/170

In any case, UNESCO make it crystal clear that they only publish the nomination description, which is written by the state party (in this case the Government of Morocco). UNESCO understandably and explicitly disclaim the description documents, and only publish them for transparency.

I do wish we didn't have these reality-distorting memes everywhere. Leave them to the far right - they don't do Islam any favours, and they piss off real historians.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is cited from 2012 according to Wikipedia. Archived versions can be accessed in the citations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_al-Qarawiyyin

This article from BBC in 2018 also makes the same mention:

https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20180318-the-worlds-oldest-centre-of-learning

[–] skeuomorphology@feddit.uk 1 points 41 minutes ago

Yes: that's the listing I went through. What you'd conclude from the documentation is that, at some point during the nomination process, the Government of Morocco made that claim. They've either since withdrawn the claim, or UNESCO has removed it. But, as with any false claim, once made it gets repeated, and the later repetition gets cited as evidence for the original claim (a form of circular citation, and one that historians get quite annoyed by because it's usually quite a deliberate attempt to 'hack' the record).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)