this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
206 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

7112 readers
5 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Claire Sharpe says she disagrees with Cycling UK only naming cis women in their top 100 list.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 27 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I really don't like that apparently "biological women" is being adopted to mean "cis women". I'm also biologically a woman, at least in part. My main sex hormone is estrogen and my testosterone is so low you cannot even measure it. So it would plainly be false to call me a "biological man". Just call me a trans woman and those that you call "biological women" cis women. Otherwise this feels like we are adopting terf terminology :(

[–] stray@pawb.social 12 points 3 days ago

Furthermore, the brain is not separate from biology; it's a body part the same as any other organ. There's plenty of research to suggest (not prove yet) that gender identity correlates to where various parts of the brain lie on a masculine-feminine spectrum, forming an individual mosaic, like a fingerprint or snowflake. Trans women are biological women in every possible sense of the phrase, and this wording is obviously chosen to de-legitimize gender identity.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Came here to say this, the "biological man/woman" phrasing is so rooted in high school level biology

Know. They know about the android infiltration, and how agents are often assigned the wrong hardware.

Thats why so many transcwomen are so good at code.

[–] Deyis@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

Also, "woman" is a gender category and therefore based in social conventions, not biology.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you understand. By taking hormones, you have forgone the weakness of your flesh and adopted an artificial, non-biological body.

Some post-menopausal cis women do this as well, which is why you don't often see older women winning sports awards either. Some men do too, but that's different because obviously it is (don't ask why, I didn't make the rules).

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not sure if I understand you correctly. You mean this is the terfs' essentialism shining through, which sees "women" as inherently inferior to "men"? It is pretty weird that those "radical" ""feminists"" have such a patriarchal view on gender and sex.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

For my last part? Yeah I don't know. Nobody seems to ever talk about how common hormones are for cis people when they talk about banning them. But yes, I was playing on the fact that for some reason women tend to be treated disproportionately (and hypocritically) worse.

Yeah but you did run on silicate body chemistry until you transitioned to a machine body in 2018.