_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
1097 points (98.9% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
9811 readers
227 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
- Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out:
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In fairness. First past the post necessarily leads to a two party state.
I'm sorry, but the only option is to single-mindedly campaign for pretentitial voting.
Voting for another party that protects his views is cute, but totally incompatible with the voting system in place in the US.
*Disclaimer that I feel entitled to comment on US politics as a citizen of the provinces (Australia)
what, precisely, is the downside of voting for a third party rather than not voting at all?
They aren't completely equivalent, though it's pretty close, sadly.
I agree that it's better for someone to get involved with a third party, but if that third party's electoral strategy is to simply try and receive more votes, then they're actively hurting under the US' terrible voting system. (This is under the assumption that this third party is less right wing that the Democrats, and that you don't want the Republicans to win).
Any third party that is actively campaigning on getting preferential voting across the line by influencing the Democrats from the outside (yeah, first part the post is that terrible that this is necessary), or is revolutionary in nature, is okay in my books.
The rest are doing active harm because of the spoiler effect.
"Blue no matter who" is really, really dumb, and people really ought to get involved with groups within and without the Democrats to vigorously push for electoral reform, and better yet the abolition of capitalism and implementation of actual democracy (the US can barely be considered a democracy).
Parties that just are campaigning on: 'Hey! Vote for us because we're better' with no actual strategy of changing the system are dumb, also.