this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
153 points (99.4% liked)

News

33209 readers
2743 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A growing share of lower-income Americans are struggling to get by financially as their wages fail to keep up with inflation, according to a recent analysis.

Roughly 29% of lower-income households are living paycheck to paycheck, up slightly from 2024 and from 27.1% in 2023, data from the Bank of America Institute shows. The financial firm defines that as spending more than 95% of household income on necessities such as housing, gasoline, groceries, utility bills and internet service.

In 2025, nearly a quarter of all U.S. households lived paycheck to paycheck, Bank of America estimates.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That seems suspiciously low. But even if it's true, the increases in healthcare premiums is gonna fix that problem.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That seems suspiciously low.

It's the real/non-propaganda number. The huge numbers you often see define "paycheck to paycheck" as simply 'not saving any money', but that includes people who make plenty of money, and just spend it all (by this definition, 1/4 of people earning at least six figures "live paycheck to paycheck"), and there are simply many more of those than there are people actually barely getting by. On the other hand:

The financial firm defines [living paycheck to paycheck] as spending more than 95% of household income on necessities such as housing, gasoline, groceries, utility bills and internet service.

This is a much more accurate definition of "living paycheck to paycheck".

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I started making 6 figures (barely. Literally salaried at 100k) a few years ago, from poverty wages. I get why people struggle around 100k. Its almost enough, but not quite, to comfortably live the american dream.

It allowed me to barely afford a decent house where i live instead of perpetually renting. If I did not have low rent before, that probably wouldn't have happened either way.

Now I am tied to my job no matter how unhappy I am until I can afford some sort of change. Whenever that will be.

These cost of living increases are making things significantly more difficult, but I can't imagine how it'd be if I was never given any sort of a break.

Makes me more sympathetic, and far more angry with this shit, knowing that I was probably one bad day away from being homeless instead.