this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
1203 points (98.2% liked)

Enshittification

562 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to Enshittification

A community for everyone who misspelt it as enshitification.

"I the onceler felt sad as I watched them all go, but business is business and business must grow, regardless of crummies in tummies you know."

This is your space to document the decay, demise, and destruction of the tech world as we know it. Share stories, articles, and firsthand experiences that capture the ongoing decline of once-celebrated platforms, services, and companies in the late stage capitalist landscape.

From monopolistic corporate shifts to anti-user updates and the relentless pursuit of profit over quality—if it’s broken, bloated, or just plain bad, it belongs here. We’re here to spotlight the moves that make the tech world worse, one piece of enshittification at a time.

Guidelines
🔹 Stay on Topic: Only post content about the decline of tech products, platforms, or companies.
🔹 Quality Content: Give some context when posting links or articles to drive quality discussions.
🔹 Respectful Discussion: Critique companies, crappy tech, and capital, not community members.
🔹 Positive Monday: The first Monday of every month is reserved for positive content only that shows enshittification isn't inevitable.

Join us to expose the changes that ruin the things we once loved and to discuss what comes next in a tech world gone wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There are people who are building and participating in alternatives. They deserve support. But people have also become accustomed to getting a lot for free.

Now I'm not defending YouTube, but they have to store billions of hours of videos and serve millions of people at a time, just so you (and me) can stream 10hrs of video a day just to listen to lo fi study music or watch let's plays. that's very expensive. The whole model is ass-backwards, that content creators exist to get paid. YouTube should be charging content creators for storing their videos, and if the creator wants to saturate their shit with ads and e-begging, then it be their choice.

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The free/cheap entitlement definitely seeps into FOSS areas. I periodically see things like "this app/platform NEEDS to have all of the functionality of the paid one, be free and easy to set up" or particularly contradictory "a Linux phone NEEDS to have reliable calls, texts, support my banking apps, WhatsApp, have modern hardware, and cost $200"

(or variations thereof)

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like the idea of free software, but users shouldn't expect people to do the work for them for free. If there's software I need that's free, great. If there's no free version, I'm not owed one and I'm not gonna complain until I get one.

[–] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Complaining is part of contributing ideas. You can contribute code, or ideas, or both. Have a look at !foss_requests@libretechni.ca.

One good principle that’s aligned with what you’re saying is that every FOSS contributor desides for themself what work to do. It’s uncivil to try to task someone in partcular with work. No one should be personally pushed to do work. Avoid that, and there is nothing wrong with reporting bugs and making suggestions generally to the commons.

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

You’re right, but this benefits rich content creators at the cost of new ones creating more income inequality in the content creation business.