this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
31 points (97.0% liked)
Politics
10984 readers
37 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't know, a true conservative should be opposing attacks on the institution of our government. And any gerrymandering is an attack on that institution. But I haven't followed him, has he come out with any proper long term solutions? Seems to me, at a federal level we need to do things like lift the artificial cap on number of representatives, limit surface area to volume of districts, and limit concavity of district lines.
But I also recognize the urgency of the moment, and I respect that Prop 50 has limited the blast radius and time in effect.
Which is exactly what Texas is doing, and Prop 50 is designed to be a reciprocal response; it's not California just going, "well if you're going to rig yours we'll rig our's better!", it's California nullifying the gerrymandering in Texas by matching it 1-to-1. If you're anti-gerrymandering, Prop 50 is what actually discourages it, by making it pointless to do.
He generally doesn't weigh in on what federal laws he thinks should change now, he stays pretty California-internal.