Politics

11108 readers

49 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

remington@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

Trump Administration Live Updates: Officials Demand States ‘Undo’ Work to Send Full Food Stamps (archive.ph)

submitted 2 months ago by Midnitte@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Trump administration told states on Saturday that they must “immediately undo” any actions to provide full food stamp benefits to low-income families, in a move that added to the uncertainty surrounding the nation’s largest anti-hunger program during the government shutdown. In late-night guidance seen by The New York Times, the Agriculture Department also threatened financial penalties against states.

Why is feeding people political? What value add is forcing people to starve? Monsters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

he first one is a hostage situation.

A hostage situation is not where they just straight up kill people for no reason. The point of holding someone hostage is that they DO NOT kill them UNLESS their demands aren't met.

The second is a thing we called appeasement

Again, no it is not. The point is feeding people, not "appeasing" conservatives.

I'm not looking for a discussion

Then WTF are you doing here? It's not my fault that you don't understand basic concepts of the English language.

What is the strategy of continuing to extend the shutdown? What do Dems have to gain? Conservatives have been shutting down more and more of the government since day 1, on purpose. Again, they're very happy to keep it shut down. "Appeasing" conservatives is KEEPING the govt shut down...

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You've really attached your ego to this delusional opinion, huh. The mental gymnastics here are almost as impressive as they are concerning.

Good luck, man. I have a suspicion that you need it more than I do. Hope whatever happened to leave you like this gets better.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

Ah yes, personal insults are a strong signal of rational individual with a strong argument...