this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
114 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

40757 readers
535 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 5 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

I'm absolutely positive they've done exactly that.

Never on a historical scale we moved so much cargo. Long-range ships were primarily used to move something extremely valuable, such as spices and gold - and now we have ships hauling everything because it's so much more efficient than anything else.

Our owners have never been so far from needing more of us

And so the solution is, instead of reducing work week and expanding social programs, to crank people up in dangerous conditions and make them do one of the hardest and most avoidable jobs known to humanity?

I didn't say "use bad methods to grow food and fuel the crew with that."

Fair, but it follows. Nowadays, in the age of cheap solar and new, eco-friendly power storage options, it is much, much easier and cheaper to add an electric engine than to maintain a fleet of wage-slaves fed by agricultural surplus.

Your kind of "solution" is both economically inefficient and inhumane, and doesn't seem to get out of the box of "9-to-5 to everyone by all means". So, don't rush to accuse me of shortsightedness.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

You're wasting your time arguing with a pigeon.

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's honestly one of the funniest threads I've read in a while.

Did you get to this part?

Rowing (or even getting out to swim and pull) is safer if you have enough people, because we can't safely make and power engines.

Like they're gonna have a fleet of oceangoing cargo ships, each towed by a massive team of willing humans, all while escaping the dastardly pirates and their motorboats.

It's like Mad Max and Waterworld had a beautiful, insane baby

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah definitely a troll. Probably AI-written unless they're really dedicated.

I like this part:

So…why rowing, of all things?

Because we have arms. What the fuck kind of question is that?

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

We also have legs, so I want to see their take on trains and how powering them with human-sized hamster wheels is better for "safety" and "efficiency"

Cargo planes in their world should be really interesting

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)