131
Newsom says Trump is ‘doubling down on stupid’ as climate change battle heats up
(www.sfchronicle.com)
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
131 points (97.8% liked)
politics
26418 readers
2691 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have listened to every single Newsom podcast. Worst thing I would say about him is he comes across as inauthentic. I roll my eyes every time he says “I appreciate that”. If he can’t break that stigma, he is destined to end up like Hillary Clinton.
As for having people like Charlie Kirk, a lot of the hate that I hear about him is mostly taken out of context.
For instance, when he says how smart they are, he’s not wrong! Charlie Kirk built a massive following from nothing and made a genuine impact on elections. If you are not willing to recognize that, then you are never going to be able to counter this.
You don’t have to agree with your opponent, but you do have to respect them.
Personally, I have enjoyed his podcasts where he talks to opposition the most as it gives me an insight into their way of thinking without having to go to conservative friendly media. I never heard of Charlie Kirk before this, and ended the podcast feeling like I understood his followers more (and also hating Kirk’s guts).
He often gently gives pushback, but he’s not there to debate. He’s there to learn. And I have learned as well.
You do not need to be smart to be charismatic. Equating the 2 is wrong to begin with.
It takes more than charisma to build what he built.
And recognizing the political intelligence of a MAGA politician is not the same as pivoting towards MAGA. You should be able to learn from them.
It takes no more than average intelligence. I know it's not the same, I'm saying that he's still not smart.
You’re entitled to your opinion. I think if this were true then there’d be millions of Charlie Kirk’s.
Literally no. It still takes a lot of dedication and charisma. Not to mention right place right time
He is very inauthentic, and his political views are heavily influenced by popularity. He's definitely a political animal. That can be good in some ways, but but in this era, where the opposition has moved so far to the right, governing from the center moves the Overton Window to the right. He'll probably win the democratic nomination, but I'd rather see someone with more authenticity that stands for something, rather than someone who moves so much with the political winds.
I don’t necessarily agree that he would govern from the “center”. But he also doesn’t give his political opinions on issues very much in the podcast. So I’m honestly not sure what he stands for.
I will be interested in seeing his comments about specific issues during his future campaign.