this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
208 points (96.4% liked)
Progressive Politics
3489 readers
139 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This doesn't appear normalized to cost increases, which might outpace the rate, which means theft is down. I seriously doubt half of all people are stealing food.
45% of shoplifters steal food, not shoppers. I would guess the others are taking clothes, jewelry, electronics, etc.
Ah sure, but are they just counting that 45% of stolen goods are food items, or 45% are only stealing food, and if so, how can they know that? What was the percent previously?
How high are you?
With how omnipresent self checkouts have become, I wouldn't be surprised if a good chunk of customers have accidentally stolen something at least once a year.
Maybe if we consider accidents. I don't really understand how they can even measure this in the first place, maybe a poll but that's very unreliable methodology and sample monitoring would need a crazy large N.
It's probably just based off of normal shrinkage metrics that stores already collect anyway. If you could get target, Walmart, and Costco to give you their data, that'd be thousands of stores.
I mean they can tell you item counts missing and total value, but how are they counting percentage of patrons? Unless you are extrapolating from catching people and assuming some likelihood of being caught...
Idk man, I'm just spit balling.
Oop I meant they are not you are, but yeah, who knows