this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
269 points (98.6% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
7800 readers
400 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Was Gate’s philanthropy always just to make other rich people think he was cool? And now that right wing politics are in, he’s shifted over? I don’t see another explanation.
He mostly used it for two things. One, as all rich people do, to donate money to their own foundations to save taxes. Second, to push his thoughts and interest on what should be research and what shouldn't.
He didn't do either of these things overtly (e.g. as Musk for the latter), but still Billionaires do Billionaire stuff.
Probs also might have helped his image with Billionaire friends and the public.
There are plenty of times when his funding things interfered. Alas there are for sure times when his funding things helped, but no one individual should posses such power.
Bill Gates wanted to think of himself as a good person. Charity was his attempt to prove himself as a good person, and Effective Altruism got so much funding and PR because it tries to make billionaires look like good people. Effective Altruism argues that rather than looking at someone's actions, you look at how much better they are than what would replace them if they didn't do that, and then argues that there will always be more billionaires that are exploitative because that's how the market works, so that doesn't count, while not every billionaire makes a charity, so that does count.
The problem for EA is that many of the charities it recommends have to engage in lobbying to be practical, but if you allow for lobbying then obviously lobbying for legislation that reduces billionaire exploitation would be beneficial, and that's not what their donors want. So EA had to drive itself insane to curve away from that obvious conclusion, with people that still insist on it being pressured out of the movement.
But the result of that is that the ethical philosophy that billionaires wanted to rely on for indulgences for their sins had now become obviously insane, even to most of them. That's how you get people like Peter Thiel not giving a straight answer to whether humanity should survive, that's how you get shrimp welfare, etc. etc.
Gates doesn't like the insanity, but that that leaves him without moral excuses. So with other billionaires throwing their lot in with Trump, he does the same so he can at least stay rich for longer.