this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
474 points (98.8% liked)
NiceMemes
799 readers
374 users here now
A place to post memes & images that won't absolutely obliterate your mental health! Memes must not stray into hopelessness and be generally positive or neutral.
I made this with my kid in mind, so that they can have a good, safe place to look at memes, just made to make folks laugh and smile!
Only goofs & silliness. (:
- no NSFW. ever.
- no sexually suggestive material
- swearing is fine, but please don't go overboard.
- no sad or depressing content
- no politics or politically-motivated content – this include comments.
- no outrage content or bait
- no AI-generated images. Understandably, some may slip through the cracks, but assume no malicious intent.
- no AI accusations. Are you unsure? Leave it be. Is it obvious it's AI? Please report it.
- No spamming of personal links. You can credit an author, but not spam or advertise.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What does Disney princess have to do with medieval?
They're kids, not historians. Medieval means knights and princesses to them. Which means Disney princesses. Let them have fun.
I don't think Plant wanted to deny their fun, just curious what the connection was.
Who said they couldn’t have fun? It’s just stupid that parents think Disney princess means medieval. And for the record, this isn’t true… there wouldn’t be actually no actual princesses and ALL Disney. It’s just a cute dumb story, sorry you fell for it.
Many of the Disney stories have been around in medieval Europe as folklore, so it’s not as much of a stretch as you suggest here
There’s a kid princess standing against the wall inside, not a Disney princess.
Yall believe way too many social media posts lol.
As pointed out in the comments, 2 maybe fit out of over a dozen plus.
That’s not many, and yes it would be asinine to assume that an entire school dressed up incorrectly. It’s not even a half believable story to begin with, as it makes no friggen sense lol.
It’s an exaggerated story to make it “worthwhile” to post to social media. Which do you think is more likely? A small lie, or an ENTIRE school dressed wrong for one sex, and yet this sole kid is a plague doctor? No female knights? People are way to gullible these days.
To me it seems you’ve switched from ranting about one thing to another, and I have no interest in following you there.
Incel ass comment
Probably because it's much easier to find Disney princess costumes than medieval ones, plus (in the US at least) nobility of any type is almost exclusively associated with the medieval period outside of occasionally remembering that the British monarchy exists.
Well I know at least 2 of them that are iconic and from a medieval-looking settings.
Snow White and Cinderella.
Neither are really princesses though. They are just “Disney female lead”.
Mulan KINDA works.
Their stories are about falling in love and end with them marrying princes. Making them princesses.
But also: Snow White was a princess from the very start. That's why the witch needed her gone; to usurp her throne.
Mulan does not even KINDA work vs these two if you want more than just "female disney lead."
Sleeping Beauty is also in a medieval setting and canonically a princess.
That's who I wanted to mention instead of Cinderella. Could not remember the name tho. 🤣
I've not seen Brave, but I think it's roughly tudor-period, and her dad's a king, so I guess that also counts
what?
Snow White and Sleeping Beauty are set in the medieval period, no?
Are they actual princesses though? The ones that are, aren’t in medieval times.
You could dress up as Princess Diana if it’s just “princesses”.
Yep, they are included in the official princess lineup, which currently has 13 members.
Golden- and silver-era princesses:
Renaissance-era princesses:
Revival-era princesses:
Note: Anna and Elsa were deemed "too successful" to be included in the princess franchise, and instead got their own "Frozen" franchise.
Umm those aren’t princesses…. Just Disney main lead that they use that term incorrectly for…
A princess is royalty who holds titles as well as duties. How many for the REAL definition, not Disney’s made up one?
I think the only exception in the Disney lineup is for Mulan. The rest are all either born royal or marry royal.
I suppose one could argue whether or not Chiefs are royalty, but culturally the role is more or less equivalent.
You must be fun at parties
Hey, they specified medieval, not princesses. And you would be surprised I guess by the amount of people who wouldn’t mind having a discussion about the absurdity of it.
People like different parties ;) try going to one first maybe.
Does this really matter? It's pedantry for the sake of it. We use terms like "princess" and "queen" colloquially to refer to groups with a shared identity, and they're all made up. Whether they have a tangential relationship to royalty doesn't really matter when you're talking about aesthetics and archetypes.
I'd suggest using "royal princess" to separate the terms and move on. There are plenty of cultural reasons to use "Disney princess" as a symbol that only incidentally relates to the company or royalty.