Actually Infuriating

779 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be Civil

Please treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriating

Politics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL posts

Please mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and Moral

No promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

649

The USDA website currently. Is this not a blatant violation of the Hatch Act? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world to c/actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My loyalty is to the spirit of the Constitution, not to a king. I might end up serving as a soldier against the crown.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't care about the document. If anything I'd say it's fatally flawed in a couple key ways. Not as bad the OG articles of confederation, but pretty bad.

What I care about is making a government that actually serves the majority of the people and represents their interests against the disproportionately powerful

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

It is my assumption that the Constitution would be overhauled or recreated, depending on how the next ten years plays out.