News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Uhm. AG is fundamentalist evangelical. Their pastors are encouraged to marry. (And the spouse is basically free labor.)
Nice try, though.
Edit to add; if that were true then you’d see a disproportionate number of sex pests outside the church being single- yet most are in fact married (because most people marry.)
The Assembly of God are by no means a mainstream Protestant denomination. None of the Pentecostals fall into what is typically viewed as the mainstream.
You should pay closer attention before replying "Nice try, though" to others because you could be making a glaring mistake.
The baptists don't have a problem? or Methodists? or Lutheran?
Your claim that allowing clergy to marry is a bald faced lie designed to make you complacent. Of course it's the catholics who have the problem- and of course it's beause their priests aren't allowed to marry and vent their perversion.
I know rational thinking is hard when it goes against everything your taught, so allow me to repeat my edit: if that claim were true, then when you step outside the church, you would see a disproportionate number of sexual harassment and other forms of sexual misconduct in the workplace among single men and disproportionately less among married men. The reality is, when it comes to sexual abuse; being married has almost no statistical effect on who is a sexual abuser.
the reality is that sexual abuse and misconduct among clergy and lay leaders is a problem in every religion, and every sect of every religion. If your particular flavor of religion doesn't have a problem... it's because your flavor doesn't see it as a problem. But it is going on. Quite probably in your own church.
I know. that's hard to hear. You're told that your pastors are to be trusted with everything, and that leaders are good and righteous.... And that's exactly why sex pests seek those positions.
Neither denomination has the problem on the scale of the Roman Catholic Church. I don't believe any clergy of any faith rapes at a rate outside of the "normal" amount for other professions.
Statements like "I know rational thinking is hard when it goes against everything your taught" suggest a real lack of maturity and thought because you don't know me. If you did you would know Im not religious.
This is yet another example of you not thinking about what you are saying and looking ignorant as a result. Nice try, though.
Yet, you're the one who has yet to drop sources, or actually address anything I've said. I find it extremely difficult to believe you have honestly evaluated just how prevalent a problem it really is. Because the overwhelming evidence is that, yes, it's in fact a huge problem.
Sorry to be so fucking candid, but we're talking about kids (and others) being sexually abused. your bullshit is just enabling that abuse.
And lets not forget this entire conversation started off with a bald faced lie, that you've probably been told so many times you don't question it:
Which I had already addressed with. Sources. which you still cling to as a lifeline.
You're also wrong about the AG not being mainstream. You would be correct if you limited that claim to the US, but globally, the World Assemblies of God Fellowship is the second or third largest protestant denomination; behind the Anglican church at #1 and jockeying WCRC for second- that comes down to whose numbers you use.
And yet also, dropped sources up there showing that what you presumably would consider mainstream... you conveniently ignore those. I stand by calling you irrational. I don't need to know you, to know that your beliefs on this matter do not comport with reality. Because the evidence is literally overwhelming.
More sources for you, because you can't be bothered to find your own:
https://www.notinourchurch.com/statistics.html
https://www.qualitativecriminology.com/pub/osa148h6
https://www.manlystewart.com/articles/how-common-is-clergy-sexual-abuse
https://www.levinsimes.com/blog/sexual-abuse-in-churches-statistics
https://baptiststandard.com/equip/child-sexual-abuse-church-widespread-problem/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/06/23/evangelical-leaders-sexual-abuse-gateway-church-sbc/74127494007/
https://www.christiantoday.com.au/news/nearly-one-in-10-protestant-americans-left-church-over-sexual-abuse-concerns-study.html
https://www.wuft.org/special-reports/2025-08-14/q-a-with-sexual-violence-expert-how-churches-and-schools-get-away-with-grooming-and-how-to-stop-abuse
You aren't being candid. You are being rude.
Nothing you say wlll have any value given your attitude here.
At least I'm not actively part of the fucking problem.
your original statement:
Because when I pointed out that your comment was irrelevant- the AG allows it's pastors to marry- you decide they're not "mainstream" enough.
Then you insist that the baptists, methodists, and lutherans aren't abusers at the same rates the catholics are... which is also false.
Then you insist that I'm being 'ignorant' and 'rude'.
even if my comments have no value here... at least my comments aren't harming people. being a bystander harms everyone except the abusers.