this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4390 readers
112 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Public transport's in a different ministerial portfolio, but spending on public transport and cycling is also a big part of what the government is doing. Since nothing in Miliband's statement contradicts the previous statements on public transport, I think it's all still going ahead as planned.

[–] knowone@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you for linking this. I've looked at every instance of "transport" in the document and it's almost all about maintaining and renewing current infrastructure. Which is good, of course, but nowhere does it seem to talk about affordability. In the part where it talks about how they're going to decarbonise the UK in regards to transport, again it just seems to talk about pushing for electric cars.

Correct me if I'm wrong and have missed things though. I'd be pleased to see that they're actually going to make public transport affordable. It's good to make what's there better and expand it. But if most people still aren't able to use it and having a car is cheaper, it's not going to have nearly the outcome it should

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

You're right, that specific factor is more thin on the ground. This is one example, for making buses in particular more affordable, while they're also investing in more electric buses (which are already the most affordable and the greenest form of public transport). The new ones we have in London are excellent! There's also the fact that a lot of our rail is already electrified, so the general push to shut down fossil fuel power stations will make trains even more eco-friendly, even if there's zero other investment to do so (which isn't the plan, as per, e.g., this document from Network Rail).

Anyway, I think we're in general agreement: affordability and accessiblity go hand in hand, and electric cars are basically a bit rubbish, so shouldn't be the focus of the government's efforts! However, even while focusing too much on privately owned EVs, they're still doing some good stuff in other areas, which is to be applauded.