this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
585 points (94.5% liked)

Political Weirdos

1197 readers
142 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A better historical note would be to say .... to have a bank account

I think up until the 50s women couldn't have a bank account in their name, without their husband signing for them or something. Up until then, women couldn't have any money in their name in a recognized bank.

For common women that is ... if you were the ultra wealthy, you could afford to skirt around banking rules ... but as a common woman with a bit of money, you couldn't have a regular bank account of your own.

[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You’re right except for the year. That wasn’t until 1974 that women could open back accounts in their own name.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

That's when legislation was passed ensuring banks couldn't block a woman getting an account on her own. Before that it was dependant on the bank.