this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
1220 points (98.7% liked)

Greentext

8744 readers
427 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Use hydrogen for that (using coal creates 1.5 tons CO² per ton steel). Green steel needs no phosphor and sulfur too, making it stronger.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Hydrogen isn't cheap, though.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago

Gets cheaper though.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is if you have a nuclear power plant

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the famously cheap nuclear power plant.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How expensive is it per MWh compared with coal if you account for removing the CO2 from the atmosphere?

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Most countries don't and won't do that, though. Coal is only expensive when a society agrees to stop externalizing the costs, and that only works if either most major countries are doing it or when they severely restrict trade with countries that keep externalizing the costs.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

and that is unfortunately game theory problem without working solution, which is why we are fucked :(