this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
1201 points (99.1% liked)

Fediverse memes

2249 readers
5 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
Specific
  1. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A platform without ads or evil corpo ownership? Yeah, I'd scared too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He's referencing /r/jailbait which was super popular on Reddit till they banned it.

I found the existence of the sub fuckjng appalling but it was also arguably a big part of the enshittifstion of Reddit. Like. I hate that it existed but it wasn't illegal.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It wasnt illegal if people only posted girls over 18 but thats not the case. There were a ton of under 18s being posted. When it was banned the sub pivoted to some like "fashion" sub and continued posting under 18s and 18s for plausible deniability.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I stand corrected then.

I thought its whole loophole thing was that it was legal which is why something that disgusting wasn't removed.

I don't know how they didn't remove something that was actually illegal from the site earlier. Double gross. Evil. Ew.

I doubly don't understand why something that was illegal wasn't removed WAY earlier.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The issue is when the entire sub is filled with people who look young enough to be under 18 its very hard for admins to tell when they're actually under 18. After the ban the fashion sub posted people clearly under 18 and used the excuse that its fine because they're clothed and they're just reviewing the fashion.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It wasn't. But it was pretty bad PR for the site.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why people as misreading you.

"It wan't" is not super clear. If you said "it wasn't popular" people would understand you better.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm confused by what you're even getting at here.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pretty sure I replied to the wrong comment ahhaha