this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

Batteries

95 readers
1 users here now

For discussion about electric batteries

founded 2 years ago
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.ca/post/233680

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Battery lifetime just isn't that important. It's why Tesla's "million mile battery" never happened - there's no market for it.

[โ€“] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I think you're missing primary the point of my proposed dual chemistry packs:

LFP and Na-ion are cheaper than NMC or NCA. So the primary benefit isn't cheaper replacement costs (thats just a side benefit). The primary benefit is: lower overall cost of the pack without sacrificing long range.

LFP and Na-ion are lower power density than NMC or NCA. A pure pack of either LFP or Na-ion would give the vehicle a substantially shorter range than a pure NMC or NCA. However a dual chemistry pack would be a cheaper pack as well as still retaining most of longer range.