this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
396 points (94.4% liked)

Witches VS Patriarchy

1116 readers
301 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When did I say they couldn't be?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

queer folks aren’t consistently funnier than men.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Could you more clearly explain how queer men are excluded in "queer folks" but queer women are not? I think you read that with the intent to presume I'm excluding them and didn't actually analyze the wording.

[–] Hexarei@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not the one responding to you originally, but your wording does directly contrast "queer folk" with men. By saying one group is funnier than the other, you're inherently creating two separate groups.

Did you perhaps mean one thing and say another? I can only read your words as putting men into a category apart from queer folk.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Ah I see. I had considered queer folks to include gnc regardless of assigned gender at birth --including queer men -- and "women" and "men" as cishet since like, they aren't queer and cishet women are still funnier than cishet men consistently.