this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
-6 points (36.4% liked)

Relationships

375 readers
1 users here now

Discuss any manner of relationship. Friends, roommates, dating, marriage, spouses, kids, etc.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ProbablyBaysean@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I read the article. The title is sucky clickbait. Tl;dr: women evaluate men based off of kind acts that reflect anticipation of needs. Narcissists do well on dating apps where they "perform" for the contacts from the "sales funnel" of dating contacts. Guys who do bankroll activities or carefully crafted morning texts are not deemed as good of a long term prospect as the kind act ones.

I want to brainstorm a theory of mine:

Developing humans have levels of empathy (social behavior) that develop based on instinct mixed with deliberate cognition:

  1. iron rule - you kiss ass to those with more power and act selfishly to those with less power
  2. golden rule - you do to others based on how you imagine you would want
  3. platinum rule - you do to others based on how you imagine they would want

Prior = prerequisite

Being able to articulate what you want is a prior. Being able to comprehend that someone else has wants in a relatively resource scarce environment is the second prior. The golden rule has a prior of being able to imagine yourself in a different situation. The platinum rule has a prior of being able to imagine a different person in their situation.

I guess that humans develop capacity to abide each "rule" by playing with cognitive abilities while executing the "lower" rule. Each person can have different "rules" they abide for different people and situations.

I think that women who search for a "kind acts" guy may be searching for a minimum level of intelligence on top of long term support in a family environment.

[โ€“] ProbablyBaysean@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Okay, I have been thinking more about thjs:

There is a final rule aka a fourth rule or celestial/godly rule - have 2 way communication with diety regarding the judgements you make and adjust to align to the diety. This normally will look like the platinum rule but has the capacity to incorporate much much more. The standard caution is "by their fruits, ye shall know them" so if the deity of your choice seems to say "go kill a political leader in the dead of night" then you should really look hard at both the laws of persecution and that you are not being deceived in any way.

The best way to grow in any of these is to keep a journal.

Humans have a hard limit on the number of people they know at between 250 and 1000, so beyond that, because humans don't empathize with math, we simply don't empathize. The outgroup then gets the short stick in negotiations. Politicians and large businesses seem to be a case in point across the board as termed "enshitiffication".

Fun.