355
Adult game developer’s PayPal funds held for over a month despite being legitimately sold on Steam [80k GBP]
(www.gamepressure.com)
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
355 points (99.7% liked)
PC Gaming
12722 readers
233 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Are there more legal protections for crypto payment processors than traditional payment processors? My understanding is that there's less regulation in the crypto space these days.
Cryptocurrencies themselves are automated, self sustaining systems - no regulation applies at that level at all. In reality crypto "payment processors" provide services of instant exchange to regular currencies, and aren't even mandatory (but they're very convenient).
So regulation applies, but only to optional middleman that perform conversion and send regular currency to the merchant
So when dealing with volume purchases via a secondary store front (as established in the article) doesn't need any kind of intercession from Steam or another processor to deal with any and all purchases? It's all completely autonomous with no intervention needed by anyone at all?
As long as merchant doesn't need to convert from crypto to regular currency, no third party is involved in the transaction, it's a direct P2P system - in other words - perfect digital cash
So you just need to say "I give this person .001 bitcoin" and they magically get it? That's wild to me.
Well, you take their address, sign a message with your private key saying .001 bitcoin goes there and propagate it over the network. But in very simple terms yep, bitcoins magically land on their address. Whole thing sustains itself on economic incentives and cryptography, without any central authority
So there is a network and backbone to it. And you need to do something more than "I give this person a bitcoins for my game" especially when working through a separate storefront. Both to ensure that the person receives their game and you receive their currency.
The problem with current transactions isn't the money itself, it's the services that use that currency.
Yes, it's a permissionless P2P network.
Signing and sending transaction is exactly it. Transaction says that you send your bitcoins to an address controlled by the other person.
Crypto doesn't ensure you get the product. Like with real cash, other party might just run away with money
Which is why intermediaries exist and why crypto isn't in any way a solution for the problem this entire post is about. And why bringing it up randomly is complete tech bro wankery.
Are you concerned that Valve runs away with your money?
Valve? Not concerned. Random company selling something I need for a good price? Sure.
The intermediaries are useful when dealing with less trustworthy merchants.
Yes, simply put, that's how it works. You should read the whitepaper: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
The first sentence: