436
Can’t pay, won’t pay: impoverished streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy
(www.theguardian.com)
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
I think the YouTube model is more of the high tech future of entertainment that was promised to us. It's one subscription to a massive service that has entire channels dedicated to whatever niche subject you are after.
Unfortunately, that great idea of a project got purchased by Google a very long time ago, and it is well into the user-hostile enshittification phase.
Hey, so, I'm old as shit and sti remember utopian scifi. Hi. No.
We were promised art without the need for patronage. Plenty. Post-scarcity. Was the dream. Was what even both sides of the fucking cold war at least had to claim, one maybe even kind of believed in¹. No subscription. No pay. And if you want to pull the 'well yes but we aren't all the way there yet' card, then explain to me how anyone can afford to eat off what YouTube or spotify pays them, then find me someone dumb enough that they still believe that's where any of this is aiming or heading.
¹while executing an unspeakably bloody purge over a bad font choice. Not, like, 'american primary school' bloody, but certainly well past the bounds of good taste.
My first reaction to your reply was that post-scarcity utopia is a bit broader in scope than having a decent streaming platform with existing technology.
But nah, you're right. It's the same greedy bullshit preventing something resembling a post-scarcity world that prevents tech products from staying good.
Unless they are free, of course. In both ways!
My first reaction to your reply was that post-scarcity utopia is a bit broader in scope than having a decent streaming platform with existing technology.
But nah, you're right. It's the same greedy bullshit preventing something resembling a post-scarcity world that prevents tech products from staying good.
Unless they are free, of course. In both ways!
I mean if you are talking pre-google youtube, I don't believe it had a subscription model... or any real plan to profit or pay it's creators. It was both hemorrhaging money itself, and giving it's creators nothing.
Post google youtube, I guess yeah it is, but worth noting mostly it isn't exactly a high production values system, with the exception of like mr beast etc... which make a boatload of money by still following the same traps as regular TV, catering to the lowest common denominators, microanalyzing maximum views on every aspect.
Yeah it's more about the idea of Youtube rather than something it actually used to be. Google has owned it so long that there's no real difference.