this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
827 points (96.6% liked)

politics

31201 readers
1697 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm going to vote Harris in Nov, but I think the perception by many on the left (including me) is that when Harris wins they won't go "good thing the left/progressive faction helped us win despite not being in lockstep with our policies because they understand how detrimental a Trump presidency will be" - they will instead go "Look at this clear mandate delivered at the ballot box. Harris' policies are overwhelmingly popular, there is no need to push for a more progressive platform."

And frankly, that's exactly what I think will happen, so I'm voting Harris, but I'm doing so knowing that I'll die of old age before there's someone like Bernie with any chance of winning again. (and that person will probably get fucked by corporatist/centrist Dems just like Bernie did anyhow)

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Again, what was the thanks that Obama got for the ACA? He lost for the next 6 years. Fucking thanks huh.

What was Biden's thanks for all his work? Lost the house. Fucking thanks huh.

That's why they need consistent victories. Not 2 years every 16 fucking years.

Frankly, they do left things in spite of the left never showing up. And they pay for it every time.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I can only cast my own vote, that's how this whole thing works. Not sure how responsible I feel for whatever you are trying to smear on me.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I responded to your "perception". That was quite the rant and rave that yes demands a response.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I find it funny that you felt that was a rant. Buhbye now.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's funny that you think that wasn't a rant you went on. It was quite an impressive one. Ciao.

[–] newfie@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why are you utilizing collective guilt in your argument?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If that's what you want to call what happened, that's you. This is what happened.

[–] newfie@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're blaming an individual for the actions of a group that they are not a part of and did not participate in. That's collective guilt

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No I'm not blaming the individual, I'm saying the group. The group that doesn't show up. Like where in that message did I specifically say him the specific individual user. And I'm saying what literally happened, you're trying to change this to guilt of some kind or other.

I seem to have a lot of messages from you that focus on frankly weird and/or incorrect pedantry. I'm out.

[–] newfie@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

and/or

"And/or" is grammatically incorrect. It should be "or" because "or" does not preclude the possibility of both being present

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Like way to show you're being weirdly pedantic. [Slow clap.]