Vintage and Retro Ads, Promos, Fliers, Etc.

1523 readers

1 users here now

For sharing images of vintage magazine ads, fliers, promos, etc.

We're going to play it pretty loose with timeframe here so please don't get offended anyone :)

Be nice. All instance rules apply.

Rules:

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

No Ads / Spamming.

No pornography.

Règles :

Soyez respectueux. Tout le monde doit se sentir le bienvenu ici.

Pas de bigoterie - y compris le racisme, le sexisme, le capacitisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie ou la xénophobie.

Pas de publicités / Pas de spam.

Pas de pornographie.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

can@sh.itjust.works

Lady Bryant clothes, print ads, 1960 (i.ibb.co)

submitted 2 years ago by letme_meowmeow@sh.itjust.works to c/vintageads@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source: Internet archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sizes 38-60?? Damn vanity sizing really did a number on women's fashion over the decades. (We're down to "00" sizing... I really don't know where they plan to go from here)

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

don't know where they plan to go from here

They could go "triple zero", "quadruple zero", etc., but a better solution would be to scrap multiple zeros and use "-1", "-2", "-3", etc.

The best solution would be to scrap vanity sizing entirely and just use the actual measurements, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] the_itsb@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"Sizes 38-60" probably denotes waist or hip measurement

Modern sizing for ladies' dresses and pants (00 - 20s) is not a direct measurement

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Still not sure what the units would be. 38 cm is tiny. 38 inches is larger than many.