this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1937 readers
58 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I remember discussing this with a colleague when it first happened, and we both agreed the most likely explanation was CP.

I'm still astonished that our top cop was dumb enough to have that on his work computer though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read most of that, but didn’t see any mention of his gaol sentence.

And it sounds like he was allowed to keep being free in public during the review despite having found said material?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This hasn't even been to trial yet, settle down.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

So in NZ you can get caught red handed with child and animal porn, be able to keep working up until you resign, and not even get arrested until after trial?

I didn't NZ was so lenient on this sort of crime, I would have assumed this may have been related to the perpetrators profession.

[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 4 points 8 hours ago

Not a huge fan of the police, but they are one of the few groups who may actually have legitimate reasons for having that material on their machines.

We should really withhold judgement until an investigation determines whether this was related to a criminal investigation in some way, or part of his personal wank bank.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 hours ago

He was already suspended due to another matter, so wasn't working anyway.

Also, you pretty much never end up in custody because of non violent crimes before trial.

[–] Flockwit@lemmy.nz 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

In NZ, criminals are punished after they've been tried and sentenced, not before. They're only detained before trial if they pose a flight risk.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

So why did the first links I clicked both mention other Kiwi's getting arrested before their trial for possessing CSAM?

One New Zealander has been arrested and five identified as “suspects” after Europol and German police shut down one of the largest child sex abuse online platforms in the world.

[...]

He said that to date, a 24-year-old man has been charged with possessing child exploitation material and is set to appear at Timaru District Court on May 13.

https://www.waikatotimes.co.nz/nz-news/360640921/one-new-zealander-arrested-five-suspects-after-europol-shuts-down-one-worlds-largest-child

Edit: Removed second link as it was a NZ'er in AUS.

Edit 2: Here's some more examples however of people being arrested after finding CSAM on their devices.

https://www.customs.govt.nz/about-us/news/media-releases/customs-arrests-three-men-for-separate-child-sexual-abuse-related-offences

https://www.customs.govt.nz/about-us/news/media-releases/man-sentenced-to-four-years-and-nine-months-imprisonment-following-customs-investigation-into-child-sexual-abuse-material

Maybe I'm just a dumb Aussie, but please help me wrap my head around why it seems to be different rules for a former deputy police commissioner?

[–] dumbass@quokk.au 2 points 20 hours ago

The old ' Rules for thee, but not for me' style of policing.