this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
705 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

72933 readers
3316 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iii@mander.xyz 28 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I've once attempted to open a bank account where they wanted video proof, and expected me to say a randomly assigned phrase, to solve the issue you mention.

I didn't do it. Fucking KYC is BS.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

As much as I dislike it, it makes sense for banks to do that.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Banks are highly regulated so it is not surprising that they would be strict in this, reddit on the other hand has no business doing it.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 28 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

has no business doing it.

Reddit is doing this as a response to regulation as well (1). Governments all around europe (2) are turning communications into a highly regulated environment ("for the children"), because they're afraid of people communicating and having thoughts. UK is just one of the early adaptors.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Banks have many safeguard to protect clients for example PCI DSS. On the other hand as far as I know this is a law requiring them to verify people and I don't think there is a standard for this. Every company will do its own thing. Highy regulated would require them to have some standard, and I don't see that.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Seems like you use the phrase "highly regulated" differently then me. You use it to describe solely the amount of control a government exercises on companies. For me it also includes the control a government exercises on people.

From my point of view the law heavily restricts, as in highly regulates, people's freedom to be. That's the mistake. Doesn't matter the specific implementation, acronym, task force, ...

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

An example for highly regulated for me would be a periodic audit to insure security and compliance with security control. This law is honestly dangerous in regards to privacy and endangers miners not help them. There no safety guards whatsoever.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5208739

You are correct that this law is dangerous regardless lf implementation though.