this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
360 points (98.1% liked)

Atheism

4998 readers
76 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why would churches endorse pedophiles and rapists? Hmmm I wonder...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Do you mean you went to an online forum full of atheists and offered up woo for critical analysis? Did you think they weren't going to tear that apart for examination and point out the flaws? That's what they do. Many atheists carry trauma from religious upbringings filled with intense spiritual experiences. They have already dismissed them as fraudulent emotional manipulation, and are on red alert against more of it.

Look, there are atheists who welcome that sort of discussion, but online atheist forums are echo chambers. That's where you find the angry ones. Theists barge in there every day and rile them up. They've got their arguments locked and loaded, with fingers on triggers. They're eager to destroy unwarranted beliefs. Eventually they might mellow out and leave the forum, but you're gonna have difficulty identifying chill atheists in the wild, especially if you lead with woo. We're trying to be content and just let you have whatever harmless beliefs you like. We've realized how much of a pain in the ass it is to try and change minds.

Shredding ideas down to their most basic parts, examining, then rebuilding what works while discarding what doesn't is the very definition of fairness and open-mindedness. It might be painful, but that's how we grow. Ideas stand and fall on their own merits. Our emotional connection to an experience is how bias is defined, and we cannot expect others to simply accept our version of reality without evidence.

Like, I've had a ghost experience, as an atheist. I didn't believe in ghosts then, and you know what? I still don't believe in them now. Brains just do weird things, and there's no good reason to blindly trust our own perceptions.

[โ€“] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I like the willingness to engage. But ya, that is no substitute for sane navigation of those emotions