this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
667 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

11689 readers
1261 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But that assume it's not a form or javascript driven button. I would agree if you say both of those methods are sketchier, but that doesn't mean they aren't legit for sure.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe they aren't legit, but I have had success using these methods.

Edited my comment as I thought I was replying to the other guy.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying your method can work but also just because you don't see a link that looks right, it's not necessarily proof of malfeasance. Could just be a weird web dev choice, or a concerted effort to keep other services from scraping links from their page. Which maybe you already know, just adding that for anyone who does not know.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying your method can work but also just because you don't see a link that looks right, it's not necessarily proof of malfeasance.

True, but with as many links as the post has it's a good way to narrow down your options, plus I assume every link on a site like this is probably malicious in some way; no risk no reward I guess.

And in situations where this method doesn't work I can just revert to the ole' holy grail strategy (which is clearly perfect in every way).

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Fair reasoning.