this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1147 readers
78 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] self@awful.systems 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

fair enough!

but I don’t actually enjoy arguing and don’t have the skills for formalized “debate” anyway.

it’s ok, nobody does. that’s why we ban it unless it’s amusing (which effectively bans debate for everyone unless they know their audience well enough to not fuck up) — shitty debatelords take up a lot of thread space and mental energy and give essentially nothing back.

wherever “here” is

SneerClub is a fairly old community if you count in its Reddit origins; part of what we do here is sneering at technofascists and other adherents to the TESCREAL belief package, though SneerClub itself tends to focus on the LessWrong Rationalists. that’s the context we tend to apply to articles like the OP.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm, you probably wouldn't/shouldn't like me particularly much then, I've not heard that term before but I do very strongly consider myself a transhumanist at the very least. I suppose I won't try to explain why that is, if it's both a place that doesn't like that stuff but also bans arguing. Feel free to laugh at my hubris I guess, if that's what you mean by sneering? Though I guess I can get the part about silicon valley types, if the technology to do what I would actually want to do with myself came out but it was developed and sold by like, Elon Musk or such I'm not touching it with the world's longest pole.

[–] self@awful.systems 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

also fair enough. you might still enjoy a scroll through our back archive of threads if you’ve got time for it — there is a historical context to transhumanism that people like Musk exploit to further their own goals, and that’s definitely something to be aware of, especially as TESCREAL elements gain overt political power. there are positive versions of transhumanism and the article calls one of them out — the Culture is effectively a model for socialist transhumanism — but one must be familiar with the historical baggage of the philosophy or risk giving cover to people currently looking to cause harm under transhumanism’s name.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I dont have a whole lot of time tonight as it happens, though I'll look through them for a little to see if I find what youre talking about. Im not sure if you know of the youtube channel "philosphy tube" or not, or if they're liked or disliked here if so, but they did a fairly critical video about the topic once that I seem to remember touching on some nasty characters involved in the beginning of it, if that kind of thing is what you mean. I do understand that there is a lot of potential harm you can do with the idea, both if implemented in a bad manner or by someone interested in abusing the power it implies, or in the nearer term using the hypothetical promise of the idea as a ruse to gain support for like, eugenics or such, but I think that there is enough potential good if done well that attempting to do it well is worth a (probably careful) try.

[–] self@awful.systems 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

no problem! I don’t mean to give you homework, just threads to read that might be of interest.

yeah, a few of us are Philosophy Tube fans, and I remember they’ve done a couple of good videos about parts of TESCREAL — their Effective Altruism and AI videos specifically come to mind.

if you’re familiar with Behind the Bastards, they’ve done a few videos I can recommend dissecting TESCREAL topics too:

  • their episodes about the Zizians are definitely worth a listen; they explore and critique the group as a cult offshoot of LessWrong Rationalism.
  • they did a couple of older videos on AI cults and their origins that are very good too.
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ive actually spent the last hour and a half or so looking back at the community a bit, especially its top posts (I really ought to sleep tbh and hence really shouldnt, but I have a trip tomorrow and so Im not really able to fall asleep anyway, oh well). I will say, that its something of a bizarre mix to me of very familiar and unfamiliar. After getting some more of an idea of what this place is, I really dont think Id really be terribly welcome here as I think I fit, like, maybe half of your acronym, more or less to a T, (but strongly disagree with the other half of it, which confusingly to me a bunch of comments on the top posts seem to suggest people think isnt possible if one accepts the others? Maybe Im reading into hyperbole or sarcasm there, Im not so good with those things). You could probably find one or two things in my comment history to point and laugh at, though I dont recommend looking there simply on account of the rambling way I talk when these things come up and all the other stuff youd have to look through to find it.

I also think I may have encountered not this community, but another community on the same instance (the techtakes one) once before, and was similarly confused about it but didnt really get what it was even after having it described, because I was unfamiliar with the reddit version or what "LessWrong" was (though I am familiar with Roko's Basilisk, which sounds like its from there? I think its one of the most laughably stupid ideas Ive come across in AI speculation discussions, but I have heard of it). Looking through your community I get a bizarre sense looking at what they apparently believe of whiplash, in that I feel like I agree with a bunch of their initial premises (to include a lot of the weirder ones that I suspect you all dislike, like utilitarianism and some of the counter-intuitive things that it can lead to on large scales) and then suddenly find they come to a conclusion that is wildly different or even inverse from the one I get. A sort of "No no thats not what that implies how the hell can you do futurism that wrong!" vibe. It might be something mundane like political values maybe, a lot of these guy seems like right wing types and I tend towards a variety of socialism.

Something I did find slightly interesting, is that I havent heard of practically any of the people that seem to recurringly come up in the top posts, like this Yud guy (except for the rich and widely reported on ones), despite seeming like at least some of my ideas would have led me to cross paths with someone that follows them. At the same time, I was somewhat surprised the person who's community I interact with the relevant topics most in didnt seem to come up (Isaac Arthur, I even searched his name out of curiosity, but didnt get any results, on the lemmy at least, i didnt try that on the reddit as I dont like going back to that platform. Maybe hes less laughable to you guys because he presents things more as a "These are the sorts of crazy sounding things a really advanced civilization might do" rather than a call to try to do them right this moment available tech notwithstanding, or maybe because he doesnt bring up his, admittedly disagreeable to me, politics up much? Regardless of that there are at least some people Ive met on his discord that sound a lot like the guys the top posts talk about lol, like some guy that is convinced chatGPT is somehow already sentient and also already smarter than any human).

I also have a bit of a conundrum with this: I dont want to block the instance, as I do think criticism of ideas I sometimes hold, even if its just pointing out how weird sounding they are to most people, is valuable, and stuff about the ones I dont hold can at least serve as examples of lines of reasoning to avoid or at least consider is a grain of salt. Its also kind of entertaining. On the other hand, I know myself well enough to know that I have very little self control and that if I see something I disagree with, especially involving a topic I care about (and some portion of the stuff that comes up here fits that), I have a hard time not ending up arguing with people about it. I dont want to do that, I waste way too much time on it and get majorly stressed out doing it, and it sounds like here its against the community rules anyway, but I also get anxious leaving a thought unsaid and usually end up spending two hours trying to find every analogy and way of explaining that I can to preclude misunderstanding, which, obviously, fails because at that point I have a rambling wall of text again. I also use lemmy fairly casually on the /all feed (it feels to small to spend time in just one or a few communities), and always forget to check where something is before jumping into a discussion, so knowing myself I'll probably end up breaking that rule unintentionally at some point. I dont suppose anyone would know of a way to like, mark an instance somehow so as to have a visual highlight on it or warning before posting a response there to "look where you're posting, dummy" or toggle the ability to make comments there or something? Probably not Im guessing, but with FOSS stuff you never know what kind of feature someone might have made. Alternately I guess I could like, ask for an instance ban or something, if that doesnt make the instance un-viewable from my account (I have no idea if it does or not), but that might be a bit far to deal with my own lack of internet discipline, I dunno.

[–] self@awful.systems 1 points 2 hours ago

Alternately I guess I could like, ask for an instance ban or something, if that doesnt make the instance un-viewable from my account

hey no problem, we’ve got systems in place for this kind of thing. happy trails.

(though for the record, re the idea that right-wing posters are allowed in here without being told to go fuck themselves: lol)