164
Trump’s big bill achieved what conservatives have been trying to do for decades
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
164 points (99.4% liked)
politics
24584 readers
2183 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes, because heaven forbid the poor and disabled enjoy life a little.
I've said this to my very conservative family when they talk about cheaters and welfare queens - I'd gladly give 10 people assistance even if some of them don't "need" it. If it helps even a majority of the group, it's worth it.
Edit: And here's a thought. What would be an acceptable third thing they most spend their time doing?
Not to mention that qualifying for Medicaid requires that your income doesn't exceed a certain amount, and that said amount is very low. Make a penny over, and there goes your "benefit."
I struggle to imagine how one could legally collect Medicaid and do more than sleep or play games.
I used to game with a veteran who broke his back during his last tour. He could still get around, but had enough problems that he was on disability and spent most of his time gaming. He was also a huge Trump supporter who constantly talked about "welfare queens" and immigrants destroying the country.. He also sold things online and didn't report his income from that so he could keep his disability. A perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black, and I still wouldn't take his disability away if it meant other people that rely on theirs also had theirs taken.
The logic is "I hate my job so you have to hate whatever you spend most of your time doing too". It makes sense if you think life is supposed to be hard but it seems like the obvious solution is to make life easier for everyone rather than harder for those who have trouble participating in our dumb economic system.
For the edit:
Go to Southern Baptist Church of course!